Literature DB >> 18089927

Effects of gender and foot-landing techniques on lower extremity kinematics during drop-jump landings.

Nelson Cortes1, James Onate, Joao Abrantes, Linda Gagen, Elizabeth Dowling, Bonnie Van Lunen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess kinematic lower extremity motion patterns (hip flexion, knee flexion, knee valgus, and ankle dorsiflexion) during various foot-landing techniques (self-preferred, forefoot, and rear foot) between genders. 3-D kinematics were collected on 50 (25 male and 25 female) college-age recreational athletes selected from a sample of convenience. Separate repeated-measures ANOVAs were used to analyze each variable at three time instants (initial contact, peak vertical ground reaction force, and maximum knee flexion angle). There were no significant differences found between genders at the three instants for each variable. At initial contact, the forefoot technique (35.79 degrees +/- 11.78 degrees ) resulted in significantly (p = .001) less hip flexion than did the self-preferred (41.25 degrees +/- 12.89 degrees ) and rear foot (43.15 degrees +/- 11.77 degrees ) techniques. At peak vertical ground reaction force, the rear foot technique (26.77 degrees +/- 9.49 degrees ) presented significantly lower (p = .001) knee flexion angles as compared with forefoot (58.77 degrees +/- 20.00 degrees ) and self-preferred (54.21 degrees +/- 23.78 degrees ) techniques. A significant difference for knee valgus angles (p = .001) was also found between landing techniques at peak vertical ground reaction force. The self-preferred (4.12 degrees +/- 7.51 degrees ) and forefoot (4.97 degrees +/- 7.90 degrees ) techniques presented greater knee varus angles as compared with the rear foot technique (0.08 degrees +/- 6.52 degrees ). The rear foot technique created more ankle dorsiflexion and less knee flexion than did the other techniques. The lack of gender differences can mean that lower extremity injuries (e.g., ACL tears) may not be related solely to gender but may instead be associated with the landing technique used and, consequently, the way each individual absorbs jump-landing energy.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18089927     DOI: 10.1123/jab.23.4.289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Biomech        ISSN: 1065-8483            Impact factor:   1.833


  29 in total

1.  A Comparison of the Habitual Landing Strategies from Differing Drop Heights of Parkour Practitioners (Traceurs) and Recreationally Trained Individuals.

Authors:  Regan J Standing; Peter S Maulder
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Analysis of the vertical ground reaction forces and temporal factors in the landing phase of a countermovement jump.

Authors:  Daniel Rojano Ortega; Elisabeth C Rodríguez Bíes; Francisco J Berral de la Rosa
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Ground reaction forces and loading rates associated with parkour and traditional drop landing techniques.

Authors:  Damien L Puddle; Peter S Maulder
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Understanding and preventing acl injuries: current biomechanical and epidemiologic considerations - update 2010.

Authors:  Timothy E Hewett; Kevin R Ford; Barbara J Hoogenboom; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2010-12

5.  The influence of heel height on sagittal plane knee kinematics during landing tasks in recreationally active and athletic collegiate females.

Authors:  Kelly M Lindenberg; Christopher R Carcia; Amy L Phelps; Robroy L Martin; Anne M Burrows
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-09

6.  The influence of heel height on vertical ground reaction force during landing tasks in recreationally active and athletic collegiate females.

Authors:  Kelly M Lindenberg; Christopher R Carcia
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-02

Review 7.  What is normal? Female lower limb kinematic profiles during athletic tasks used to examine anterior cruciate ligament injury risk: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aaron S Fox; Jason Bonacci; Scott G McLean; Michael Spittle; Natalie Saunders
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Biomechanical approaches to understanding the potentially injurious demands of gymnastic-style impact landings.

Authors:  Marianne Gittoes; Gareth Irwin
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2012-01-13

9.  Landing technique affects knee loading and position during athletic tasks.

Authors:  Nelson Cortes; Steven Morrison; Bonnie L Van Lunen; James A Onate
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 4.319

10.  Neuromuscular characteristics of individuals displaying excessive medial knee displacement.

Authors:  Darin A Padua; David R Bell; Micheal A Clark
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.