Literature DB >> 22244048

Biomechanical approaches to understanding the potentially injurious demands of gymnastic-style impact landings.

Marianne Gittoes1, Gareth Irwin.   

Abstract

Gymnasts are exposed to a high incidence of impact landings due to the execution of repeated dismount performances. Biomechanical research can help inform recent discussions surrounding a proposed rule change in potentially injurious gymnastic dismounting. The review examines existing understanding of the mechanisms influencing the impact loads incurred in gymnastic-style landings achieved using biomechanical approaches. Laboratory-based and theoretical modelling research of inherent and regulatory mechanisms is appraised. The integration of the existing insights into injury prevention interventions studies is further considered in the appraisals. While laboratory-based studies have traditionally been favoured, the difficulty in controlling and isolating mechanisms of interest has partially restricted the understanding gained. An increase in the use of theoretical approaches has been evident over the past two decades, which has successfully enhanced insight into less readily modified mechanisms. For example, the important contribution of mass compositions and 'tuned' mass coupling responses to impact loading has been evidenced. While theoretical studies have advanced knowledge in impact landing mechanics, restrictions in the availability of laboratory-based input data have suppressed the benefits gained. The advantages of integrating laboratory-based and theoretical approaches in furthering scientific understanding of loading mechanisms have been recognised in the literature. Since a multi-mechanism contribution to impact loading has been evident, a deviation away from studies examining isolated mechanisms may be supported for the future. A further scientific understanding of the use of regulatory mechanisms in alleviating a performer's inherent injury predisposition may subsequently be gained and used to inform potential rule changes in gymnastics. While the use of controlled studies for providing scientific evidence for the effectiveness of gymnastics injury counter measures has been advocated over the past decade, a lack of information based on randomised controlled studies or actual evaluation of counter measures in the field setting has been highlighted. The subsequent integration of insight into biomechanical risk factors of landing with clinical practice interventions has been recently advocated.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22244048      PMCID: PMC3398328          DOI: 10.1186/1758-2555-4-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol        ISSN: 1758-2555


  47 in total

Review 1.  Balancing the risk of injury to gymnasts: how effective are the counter measures?

Authors:  R M Daly; S L Bass; C F Finch
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Contributions of lower extremity joints to energy dissipation during landings.

Authors:  S N Zhang; B T Bates; J S Dufek
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Foot placement modifies kinematics and kinetics during drop jumping.

Authors:  I Kovács; J Tihanyi; P Devita; L Rácz; J Barrier; T Hortobágyi
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Ground Reaction Forces Among Gymnasts and Recreational Athletes in Drop Landings.

Authors:  Jeff G. Seegmiller; Steven T. McCaw
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Effect of landing stiffness on joint kinetics and energetics in the lower extremity.

Authors:  P Devita; W A Skelly
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Whole-body and multi-joint kinematic control strategy variability during backward rotating dismounts from beam.

Authors:  Marianne J R Gittoes; Gareth Irwin; David R Mullineaux; David G Kerwin
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.337

7.  An experimental and analytical study of impact forces during human jumping.

Authors:  H N Ozgüven; N Berme
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Ankle biomechanics during four landing techniques.

Authors:  B P Self; D Paine
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Kinetics of the lower extremities during drop landings from three heights.

Authors:  J L McNitt-Gray
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Clinical correlates to laboratory measures for use in non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injury risk prediction algorithm.

Authors:  Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Jane Khoury; Paul Succop; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.063

View more
  4 in total

1.  INVESTIGATION OF OPTIMAL LUMBAR SPINE POSTURE DURING A SIMULATED LANDING TASK IN ELITE GYMNASTS.

Authors:  Lawrence Sonvico; Simon M Spencer; Louise Fawcett; Jonathan Bucke; Nicola R Heneghan; Alison Rushton
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-02

2.  On the coordination of highly dynamic human movements: an extension of the Uncontrolled Manifold approach applied to precision jump in parkour.

Authors:  Galo Maldonado; François Bailly; Philippe Souères; Bruno Watier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Strategies of elite Chinese gymnasts in coping with landing impact from backward somersault.

Authors:  Chengliang Wu; Weiya Hao; Qichang Mei; Xiaofei Xiao; Xuhong Li; Wei Sun
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Children's Single-Leg Landing Movement Capability Analysis According to the Type of Sport Practiced.

Authors:  Isaac Estevan; Gonzalo Monfort-Torres; Roman Farana; David Zahradnik; Daniel Jandacka; Xavier García-Massó
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.