Literature DB >> 18088862

General technique of third molar removal.

Sam E Farish1, Gary F Bouloux.   

Abstract

The most commonly performed surgical procedure in most oral and maxillofacial surgery practices is the removal of impacted third molars. Extensive training, skill, and experience allow this procedure to be performed in an atraumatic fashion with local anesthesia, sedation, or general anesthesia. The decision to remove symptomatic third molars is not usually difficult, but the decision to remove asymptomatic third molars is sometimes less clear and requires clinical experience. A wide body of literature (discussed elsewhere in this issue) attempts to establish clinical practice guidelines for dealing with impacted teeth. Data is beginning to accumulate from third molar studies, which hopefully will provide surgeons and their patients with evidence-based guidelines regarding elective third molar surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18088862     DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2006.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am        ISSN: 1042-3699            Impact factor:   2.802


  8 in total

1.  Importance of Clinical and Radiological Parameters in Assessment of Surgical Difficulty in Removal of Impacted Mandibular 3rd Molars: A New Index.

Authors:  Indraniil Roy; Shridhar D Baliga; Archana Louis; Sanjay Rao
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-12-24

2.  Does the Relationship between Retained Mandibular Third Molar and Mandibular Angle Fracture Exist? An Assessment of Three Possible Causes.

Authors:  Bruno G Duarte; Diogo Assis; Paulo Ribeiro-Júnior; Eduardo Sanches Gonçales
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2012-09

3.  [Effect of triangular flap design and healing procedure on the sequelae after extraction of impacted lower third molars].

Authors:  W Qi; J N Li; J R Zhao; H X Xing; J Pan
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-10-18

4.  Influence of two different surgical techniques on the difficulty of impacted lower third molar extraction and their post-operative complications.

Authors:  Alexandra Mavrodi; Ani Ohanyan; Nikos Kechagias; Antonis Tsekos; Konstantinos Vahtsevanos
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2015-09-01

5.  Is overweight a risk factor for adverse events during removal of impacted lower third molars?

Authors:  Ricardo Wathson Feitosa de Carvalho; Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-12-08

6.  Single blind, randomized study comparing clinical equivalence of Trusilk ® and Mersilk ® silk sutures for mucosal closure following surgical removal of mesioangular impacted mandibular third molar.

Authors:  Ramdas Balakrishna; Dharnappa Poojary; Arvind R; Shrikanth Sali; Ashok Kumar Moharana; Deepak Ts
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2022-06-21

7.  Dental anxiety is related to postoperative symptoms in third molar surgery.

Authors:  Feng Qiao; Menghua Zhang; Tingting Zhang; Dongwang Zhu
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 5.435

8.  Lingual guttering technique for removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

Authors:  Tejraj P Kale; Vikram S Pandit; Shankargouda Patil; Vivek Pawar; Nisha Shetty
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.