Literature DB >> 18087115

Factorial validity of the noise sensitivity questionnaire.

Martin Schutte1, Stephan Sandrock, Barbara Griefahn.   

Abstract

The Noise Sensitivity Questionnaire (NoiSeQ) aims at the measurement of global noise sensitivity as well as the sensitivity for five domains of everyday life namely 'Leisure', 'Work', 'Habitation', 'Communication' and 'Sleep'. The present investigation examined the factorial validity of the NoiSeQ to determine whether the items of the NoiSeQ cover the different factors as assumed. The analysis was done using the method of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The linear structural model took into consideration only the scales of the NoiSeQ for which reliability could be demonstrated, namely, 'Sleep', 'Communication', 'Habitation' and 'Work'. The linear structural model presumed that each of the 28 items has a relation only to one corresponding factor. Furthermore, the model allowed for correlations between the four factors. The data base encompassed 293 persons. Parameter estimation was based on the General Least Square method. The data was checked with respect to the occurrence of multivariate outliers, deviation from multivariate normality and existing collinearities. The data met the overall requirements of a CFA. The evaluation of model fit was based on the relative chi2 -value, the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, the Goodness of Fit Index, the Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index and the Root Mean Square Residual. All fit indices indicated an acceptable match of the model. As the postulated structure of the NoiSeQ was consistent with the empirical data, the classification of the items as well as the claimed interdependencies between the scales can be maintained. The regression weights of all items as well as the correlations between the latent variables were statistically significant. The estimated reliability of the latent variables took values of >/=0.84. The findings generally justified the conclusion that there is no urgent need to modify the four scales of the NoiSeQ thus, indicating the factorial validity of the NoiSeQ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18087115     DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.37425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Noise Health        ISSN: 1463-1741            Impact factor:   0.867


  4 in total

1.  Exploring the relationship between noise sensitivity, annoyance and health-related quality of life in a sample of adults exposed to environmental noise.

Authors:  Daniel Shepherd; David Welch; Kim N Dirks; Renata Mathews
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Impairing effects of noise in high and low noise sensitive persons working on different mental tasks.

Authors:  Stephan Sandrock; Martin Schütte; Barbara Griefahn
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Antibiotic Resistance in Wastewater Treatment Plants and Transmission Risks for Employees and Residents: The Concept of the AWARE Study.

Authors:  Laura Wengenroth; Fanny Berglund; Hetty Blaak; Mariana Carmen Chifiriuc; Carl-Fredrik Flach; Gratiela Gradisteanu Pircalabioru; D G Joakim Larsson; Luminita Marutescu; Mark W J van Passel; Marcela Popa; Katja Radon; Ana Maria de Roda Husman; Daloha Rodríguez-Molina; Tobias Weinmann; Andreas Wieser; Heike Schmitt
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-21

4.  Children's Effortful Control Skills, but Not Their Prosocial Skills, Relate to Their Reactions to Classroom Noise.

Authors:  Jessica Massonnié; Philippe Frasseto; Terry Ng-Knight; Katie Gilligan-Lee; Natasha Kirkham; Denis Mareschal
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.614

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.