Literature DB >> 11250847

Deprivation and late presentation of glaucoma: case-control study.

S Fraser1, C Bunce, R Wormald, E Brunner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify socioeconomic risk factors for first presentation advanced glaucomatous visual field loss.
DESIGN: Hospital based case-control study with prospective identification of patients.
SETTING: Three hospital eye departments. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients newly diagnosed with glaucoma (n=220). Cases (late presenters) were those presenting with advanced glaucoma (n=110), controls were those with early glaucoma (n=110).
RESULTS: Median underprivileged area scores were higher among late presenters (29.5; interquartile range 9.0-42.2) than in the control group (21.3; 6.1-37.4) (P=0.035). Late presenters were more likely to be of lower occupational class (odds ratio adjusted for age and referral centre 20.1 (95% confidence interval 2.6 to 155) for group III compared with group I-II and 86.0 (11.0 to 673 for group IV-V compared with group I-II), to have no access to a car (2.2; 1.2 to 4.0), to have left full time education at age 14 or less (7.5; 2.3 to 24.7), and to be tenants rather than owner occupiers (local authority tenants 3.2; 1.7 to 5.8, private tenants 2.1; 0.7 to 5.8). Effects of deprivation were partly accounted for by family history of glaucoma, time since last visit to an optometrist, and lack of an initial diagnosis of glaucoma by an optometrist.
CONCLUSIONS: Area and individual level deprivation were both associated with late presentation of glaucoma. Existing evidence shows that late presentation is an important risk factor for subsequent blindness. Deprived groups thus seem to be at greater risk of going blind from glaucoma. Material deprivation may be associated with more aggressive disease as well as later presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11250847      PMCID: PMC26542          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7287.639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  21 in total

1.  Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey.

Authors:  J M Tielsch; A Sommer; J Katz; R M Royall; H A Quigley; J Javitt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Identification of underprivileged areas.

Authors:  B Jarman
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-05-28

3.  Risk factors for late presentation in chronic glaucoma.

Authors:  S Fraser; C Bunce; R Wormald
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Socioeconomic status and visual impairment among urban Americans. Baltimore Eye Survey Research Group.

Authors:  J M Tielsch; A Sommer; J Katz; H Quigley; S Ezrine
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-05

5.  Risk factors for rate of progression of glaucomatous visual field loss: a computer-based analysis.

Authors:  R Wilson; A M Walker; D K Dueker; R P Crick
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-05

6.  Increased plasma free cortisol in ocular hypertension and open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  B Schwartz; G McCarty; B Rosner
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-08

7.  The rate of progression of scotomas in glaucoma.

Authors:  F S Mikelberg; M Schulzer; S M Drance; W Lau
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-01-15       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Why do some people go blind from glaucoma?

Authors:  W M Grant; J F Burke
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black Americans. The Baltimore Eye Survey.

Authors:  A Sommer; J M Tielsch; J Katz; H A Quigley; J D Gottsch; J Javitt; K Singh
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-08

10.  Stage at diagnosis in breast cancer: race and socioeconomic factors.

Authors:  B L Wells; J W Horm
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  61 in total

1.  Doctors must learn to let others treat them and their families.

Authors:  D Bass
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-07

Review 2.  Primary care and ophthalmology in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  S F Riad; J K G Dart; R J Cooling
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Socio-economic disparities in mortality due to pandemic influenza in England.

Authors:  Paul D Rutter; Oliver T Mytton; Matthew Mak; Liam J Donaldson
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Rationing and deprivation: disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Trudy Owens; Nikos Evangelou; David K Whynes
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2012-01-24

5.  Provision of eye care: commissioning change.

Authors:  Tarun Sharma; Richard Wormald; Wendy Franks
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  The NHS Act of 1951; is it time to re-act?

Authors:  G Ratnarajan; R Wormald; N Astbury
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Glaucoma Care of Prison Inmates at an Academic Hospital.

Authors:  Levi N Kanu; Inae Jang; Daniel J Oh; Manpreet S Tiwana; Amy A Mehta; Mark S Dikopf; Thasarat S Vajaranant; Ahmad A Aref; Deepak P Edward
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 7.389

8.  Glaucoma in southwest Nigeria: clinical presentation, family history and perceptions.

Authors:  Bola J Adekoya; Shaheen P Shah; Adeola O Onakoya; Abdulkabir A Ayanniyi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-19       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Awareness of glaucoma, and health beliefs of patients suffering primary acute angle closure.

Authors:  S-M Saw; G Gazzard; D Friedman; P J Foster; J G Devereux; M L Wong; S Seah
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Risk factors for glaucoma needing more attention.

Authors:  Anne L Coleman; Gergana Kodjebacheva
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2009-09-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.