Literature DB >> 18086218

Effects of feeding probiotics during weaning on infections and antibody responses to diphtheria, tetanus and Hib vaccines.

Christina E West1, Leif Gothefors, Marta Granström, Helena Käyhty, Marie-Louise K C Hammarström, Olle Hernell.   

Abstract

Microbial exposure is necessary for the development of normal immune function, which has driven the idea of using probiotics for treatment and prevention of immune-mediated diseases in infancy and childhood. Mounting evidence indicates that probiotics have immunomodulatory effects. However, the mechanisms are still poorly understood. Specific antibody response is a valuable proxy for immune system maturation status in infancy. We aimed at determining the impact of Lactobacillus F19 (LF19) during weaning on infections and IgG antibody responses to routine vaccines. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized intervention trial, infants were fed cereals with (n = 89) or without LF19 (n = 90) from 4 to 13 months of age. Infants were immunized with DTaP (diphtheria and tetanus toxoid and acellular pertussis), polio and Hib-conjugate vaccines at (3), 5(1/2) and 12 months of age. We assessed the number of days with infections, antibiotic prescriptions and antibody concentrations to Hib capsular polysaccharide (HibPS), diphtheria toxin (D) and tetanus toxoid (T) before and after the second and third doses. Days with infectious symptoms did not differ between the groups. Days with antibiotic prescriptions were fewer in the LF19 group (p = 0.044). LF19 enhanced anti-D concentrations when adjusting for breastfeeding duration and colonization with LF19 (p = 0.024). There was an interaction of the intervention and colonization with LF19 on anti-T concentrations during the course of vaccination (p = 0.035). The anti-HibPS concentrations were higher after the first and second dose of Hib vaccine in infants breastfed <6 months compared with those breastfed > or =6 months (p < 0.05), with no effect by LF19. In conclusion, feeding LF19 did not prevent infections, but increased the capacity to raise immune responses to protein antigens, with more pronounced effects in infants breastfed <6 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18086218     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2007.00583.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol        ISSN: 0905-6157            Impact factor:   6.377


  25 in total

Review 1.  Probiotics, enteric and diarrheal diseases, and global health.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Preidis; Colin Hill; Richard L Guerrant; B S Ramakrishna; Gerald W Tannock; James Versalovic
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Factors That Influence the Immune Response to Vaccination.

Authors:  Petra Zimmermann; Nigel Curtis
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Bile tolerant Lactobacillus reuteri isolated from pig feces inhibits enteric bacterial pathogens and porcine rotavirus.

Authors:  Byeong Joo Seo; Mi Ran Mun; Rejish Kumar V J; Chul-Joong Kim; Insun Lee; Young-Hyo Chang; Yong-Ha Park
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 4.  Probiotics, antibiotics and the immune responses to vaccines.

Authors:  Ira Praharaj; Sushil M John; Rini Bandyopadhyay; Gagandeep Kang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Administration of a probiotic associated with nasal vaccination with inactivated Lactococcus lactis-PppA induces effective protection against pneumoccocal infection in young mice.

Authors:  E Vintiñi; J Villena; S Alvarez; M Medina
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Probiotics and colostrum/milk differentially affect neonatal humoral immune responses to oral rotavirus vaccine.

Authors:  Kuldeep S Chattha; Anastasia N Vlasova; Sukumar Kandasamy; Malak A Esseili; Christine Siegismund; Gireesh Rajashekara; Linda J Saif
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Effect of probiotic supplementation on immunoglobulins, isoagglutinins and antibody response in children of low socio-economic status.

Authors:  Néstor Pérez; Juan C Iannicelli; Cecilia Girard-Bosch; Silvia González; Ana Varea; Liliana Disalvo; María Apezteguia; Juan Pernas; Dimas Vicentin; Ricardo Cravero
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 5.614

8.  Should the human microbiome be considered when developing vaccines?

Authors:  Rosana B R Ferreira; L Caetano M Antunes; B Brett Finlay
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  Probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus enhances the immunogenicity of an oral rotavirus vaccine in gnotobiotic pigs.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Marli S P Azevedo; Ke Wen; Ana Gonzalez; Linda J Saif; Guohua Li; Ahmed E Yousef; Lijuan Yuan
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Pre-protective effects of dietary chitosan supplementation against oxidative stress induced by diquat in weaned piglets.

Authors:  Y Q Xu; Y Y Xing; Z Q Wang; S M Yan; B L Shi
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 3.667

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.