Literature DB >> 18086049

A multicenter, 47-month study of safety and efficacy of calcium hydroxylapatite for soft tissue augmentation of nasolabial folds and other areas of the face.

Neil S Sadick1, Bruce E Katz, Deborshi Roy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Each soft tissue filler product has its own unique profile in terms of adverse events. In this large-scale study, we investigated the safety profile of Radiesse, an injectable calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) implant, in treatment of nasolabial folds and other areas of the face. We also investigated the efficacy in a subset of the larger patient group.
METHODS: After obtaining informed consent from the subjects, researchers injected CaHA at two treatment centers into 113 patients (100 women and 13 men, ranging in age from 26 to 78 years) for a variety of facial aesthetic applications over a period of 47 months. Seventy-five patients had a single injection session; 38 had multiple sessions. Most patients (102) received 1.0 mL of CaHA per session; 12 received 2.0 mL per session. Typically, CaHA was administered with a 27-gauge 0.5- or 1 1/4-in. needle.
RESULTS: Safety. Of 113 patients, only 7 reported minor adverse events that were short-term and resolved within 1 month: transient ecchymosis (3), nongranulatomous submucosal nodules of the lip (2), and inflammation and edema (2). Efficacy. Efficacy ratings were performed for a subset of patients (n=41). On a scale of 1 to 5 (1=unsatisfactory; 5=excellent), the mean patient evaluation score for look and feel of the implant was 4.6; the mean physician scores for the look and feel of the implant were 4.5 and 4.6, respectively. During the 6-month follow-up visit, patients' mean ratings of the look and feel of the implant were 4.8 and 4.9, respectively. The physician's mean ratings for the look and feel of the implant were 4.5 and 4.9, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In our study, CaHA performed well, with a favorable safety profile, high patient satisfaction (90% of patients reported very good or excellent results), and good durability. We are especially pleased with the low incidence of adverse events coupled with the favorable responses from the patients themselves due to longevity of correction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18086049     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33351.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatol Surg        ISSN: 1076-0512            Impact factor:   3.398


  5 in total

1.  What's New in Fillers in 2010?

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2010-08

Review 2.  Calcium hydroxylapatite: over a decade of clinical experience.

Authors:  Jani Van Loghem; Yana Alexandrovna Yutskovskaya; Wm Philip Werschler
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2015-01

3.  Soft tissue augmentation in dermatology - 2009 update.

Authors:  Michael H Gold
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2010-01

4.  Technical Considerations for Filler and Neuromodulator Refinements.

Authors:  José Raúl Montes; Anthony J Wilson; Brian L Chang; Ivona Percec
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-12-14

5.  A Cross-sectional Analysis of Adverse Events and Litigation for Injectable Fillers.

Authors:  Hani M Rayess; Peter F Svider; Curtis Hanba; Vivek Sagar Patel; Louis M DeJoseph; Michael Carron; Giancarlo F Zuliani
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.611

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.