Literature DB >> 18085343

The role of extended lymphadenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: strength of the evidence.

Michael B Farnell1, Gerard V Aranha, Yuji Nimura, Fabrizio Michelassi.   

Abstract

With improvements in the safety of Whipple resection in recent decades, surgeons have continued to explore the role of more extensive lymphadenectomy in hope of improving long-term survival. A systematic literature search of level I evidence addressing the role of the extent of lymphadenectomy was undertaken. Only reports of prospective, randomized controlled trials comparing pancreaticoduodenectomy with standard lymphadenectomy to pancreaticoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy where information regarding survival, morbidity, mortality, the number of resected lymph nodes in each group and detailed operative technique were included. Four prospective, randomized trials comprising some 424 patients and one meta-analysis were identified. In aggregate, these studies confirmed that the number of resected lymph nodes was significantly higher in the pancreaticoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy group. Morbidity and mortality rates were comparable. Postoperative diarrhea in the early months after operation was problematic in patients undergoing extended lymphadenectomy. In none of the studies was a benefit in long-term survival demonstrated. Standard pancreaticoduodenectomy continues to be the operation of choice for adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18085343     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0451-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  20 in total

1.  Surgical curability and prognosis for standard versus extended resection for T1 carcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  K Satake; H Nishiwaki; H Yokomatsu; Y Kawazoe; K Kim; A Haku; K Umeyama; I Miyazaki
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992-09

Review 2.  Cancer of the pancreas: radical resection--supporting view.

Authors:  D W McFadden; H A Reber
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  1994

3.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: comparison of morbidity and mortality and short-term outcome.

Authors:  C J Yeo; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; J Coleman; P K Sauter; R H Hruban; H A Pitt; K D Lillemoe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Michael B Farnell; Randall K Pearson; Michael G Sarr; Eugene P DiMagno; Lawrence J Burgart; Tamela R Dahl; Nathan Foster; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group.

Authors:  S Pedrazzoli; V DiCarlo; R Dionigi; F Mosca; P Pederzoli; C Pasquali; G Klöppel; K Dhaene; F Michelassi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Curative treatment for pancreatic neoplasms. Radical resection.

Authors:  H A Reber; S W Ashley; D McFadden
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Aggressive surgery for pancreatic duct cell cancer: feasibility, validity, limitations.

Authors:  S Takahashi; Y Ogata; H Miyazaki; D Maeda; S Murai; K Yamataka; T Tsuzuki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Surgical strategy for carcinoma of the pancreas head area based on clinicopathologic analysis of nodal involvement and plexus invasion.

Authors:  M Kayahara; T Nagakawa; K Ueno; T Ohta; Y Tsukioka; I Miyazaki
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality.

Authors:  Charles J Yeo; John L Cameron; Keith D Lillemoe; Taylor A Sohn; Kurtis A Campbell; Patricia K Sauter; JoAnn Coleman; Ross A Abrams; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma--part 3: update on 5-year survival.

Authors:  Taylor S Riall; John L Cameron; Keith D Lillemoe; Kurtis A Campbell; Patricia K Sauter; JoAnn Coleman; Ross A Abrams; Daniel Laheru; Ralph H Hruban; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  20 in total

1.  Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy after transhiatal esophagectomy sparing the right gastroepiploic vessels and gastric tube.

Authors:  Georgios P Fragulidis; Panagiotis G Athanasopoulos; Aikaterini Melemeni; Konstantinos D Chondrogiannis; Konstantinos Nastos; Vassileios Koutoulidis; Andreas Polydorou
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  The lymphatic system and pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Darci M Fink; Maria M Steele; Michael A Hollingsworth
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 8.679

3.  Redefining resection margin status in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Caroline S Verbeke; Krishna V Menon
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Is progress by selection, really progress?

Authors:  Murray F Brennan
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Long-term survival after resection of pancreatic cancer: a single-center retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Takehito Yamamoto; Shintaro Yagi; Hiromitsu Kinoshita; Yusuke Sakamoto; Kazuyuki Okada; Kenji Uryuhara; Takeshi Morimoto; Satoshi Kaihara; Ryo Hosotani
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Lymph node retrieval in pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens: does educating the pathologist matter?

Authors:  D Rohan Jeyarajah; Amit Khithani; Veeraiah Siripurapu; Elizabeth Liu; Ashley Thomas; A Joe Saad
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 7.  Extended Versus Standard Lymphadenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Bobby V M Dasari; Sandro Pasquali; Ravinder S Vohra; Andrew M Smith; Mark A Taylor; Robert P Sutcliffe; Paolo Muiesan; Keith J Roberts; John Isaac; Darius F Mirza
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  The influence of total nodes examined, number of positive nodes, and lymph node ratio on survival after surgical resection and adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic cancer: a secondary analysis of RTOG 9704.

Authors:  Timothy N Showalter; Kathryn A Winter; Adam C Berger; William F Regine; Ross A Abrams; Howard Safran; John P Hoffman; Al B Benson; John S MacDonald; Christopher G Willett
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  [Total pancreatectomy: renaissance of a surgical procedure].

Authors:  T Keck; U T Hopt
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 10.  Surgical treatment of pancreatic head cancer: concept revolutions and arguments.

Authors:  Zhe Cao; Jianwei Xu; Qianqian Shao; Taiping Zhang; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.