Literature DB >> 18084733

Nutrient profiling schemes: overview and comparative analysis.

Marcella Garsetti1, Jan de Vries, Maurice Smith, Amélie Amosse, Nathalie Rolf-Pedersen.   

Abstract

Nutrient profiling is a discipline aimed at classifying foods based on their nutritional composition. So far, several profiling schemes have been proposed for varied purposes world-wide. Primary aim to inventory the main profiling schemes that have been developed so far (both applied and not) and to summarise their main aspects. Secondary aim to critically review a selection of them, to test their "performance" and to evaluate their strengths and weaknesses. Scientific and popular search engines were used for identifying profiling schemes. Schemes were described concisely by providing details on four main "Building Blocks" or factors: (1) Food category declination: category-wise or "across the board"; (2) Reference amount: 100 g, 100 kcal; serving; (3) Cut-off use: thresholds or scores; (4) Nutrients Selection: balance between positive and negative nutrients and number of them. The "performance" analysis was done by testing how the selected schemes classify a sample of food. Profiling schemes display considerable variation based on the underlying approach, format and content. Moreover, the rationale of the schemes largely varies and seems to be inspired by either nutrient recommendations or regulations figures. When tested for "performance", the five selected schemes classify in the same way foods having either a very "positive" or a very "negative" nutrient profile, whereas they give inconsistent results for food products with intermediate characteristics. Strengths and weaknesses analysis shows the difficulty of finding schemes combining qualities such as simplicity, scientific relevance, ability to cope with changes in nutrient recommendations. Current proposed profiling schemes exhibit a wide range of differences both in terms of approaches and "performance". Nutrition scientists have now the challenge to develop the "ideal scheme" that, in our view, will have to be strict enough to ensure consumer protection but also flexible enough to encourage food industry innovation and to promote a "healthy" competitive market.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18084733     DOI: 10.1007/s00394-007-2002-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nutr        ISSN: 1436-6207            Impact factor:   5.614


  7 in total

1.  Composite index for aggregating nutrient density using food labels: ratio of recommended to restricted food components.

Authors:  Douglas M Scheidt; Eileen Daniel
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.045

2.  Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids.

Authors:  Paula Trumbo; Sandra Schlicker; Allison A Yates; Mary Poos
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2002-11

3.  The origin of Guideline Daily Amounts and the Food Standards Agency's guidance on what counts as 'a lot' and 'a little'.

Authors:  Mike Rayner; Peter Scarborough; Carol Williams
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.022

4.  Concept of a nutritious food: toward a nutrient density score.

Authors:  Adam Drewnowski
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  A nutrient density standard for vegetables and fruits: nutrients per calorie and nutrients per unit cost.

Authors:  Nicole Darmon; Michel Darmon; Matthieu Maillot; Adam Drewnowski
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2005-12

6.  A method to improve the nutritional quality of foods and beverages based on dietary recommendations.

Authors:  C A J Nijman; I M Zijp; A Sierksma; A J C Roodenburg; R Leenen; C van den Kerkhoff; J A Weststrate; G W Meijer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  A multipurpose tool to evaluate the nutritional quality of individual foods: Nutrimap.

Authors:  E Labouze; C Goffi; L Moulay; V Azaïs-Braesco
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 4.022

  7 in total
  13 in total

1.  Validation of the FSA nutrient profiling system dietary index in French adults-findings from SUVIMAX study.

Authors:  Chantal Julia; Caroline Méjean; Mathilde Touvier; Sandrine Péneau; Camille Lassale; Pauline Ducrot; Serge Hercberg; Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  The association between a nutritional quality index and risk of chronic disease.

Authors:  Stephanie E Chiuve; Laura Sampson; Walter C Willett
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Nutrient-rich foods, cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality: the Rotterdam study.

Authors:  M T Streppel; D Sluik; J F van Yperen; A Geelen; A Hofman; O H Franco; J C M Witteman; E J M Feskens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Potential effects of nutrient profiles on nutrient intakes in the Netherlands, Greece, Spain, USA, Israel, China and South-Africa.

Authors:  Annet J C Roodenburg; Anke Schlatmann; Mariska Dötsch-Klerk; Robert Daamen; Jie Dong; Marta Guarro; Margarita Stergiou; Nazeeia Sayed; Eunice Ronoh; Léon Jansen; Jacob C Seidell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Performance of a five category front-of-pack labelling system - the 5-colour nutrition label - to differentiate nutritional quality of breakfast cereals in France.

Authors:  Chantal Julia; Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot; Pauline Ducrot; Sandrine Péneau; Mathilde Touvier; Caroline Méjean; Serge Hercberg
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Are edible insects more or less 'healthy' than commonly consumed meats? A comparison using two nutrient profiling models developed to combat over- and undernutrition.

Authors:  C L R Payne; P Scarborough; M Rayner; K Nonaka
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  A nutrient profiling system for the (re)formulation of a global food and beverage portfolio.

Authors:  Antonis Vlassopoulos; Gabriel Masset; Veronique Rheiner Charles; Cassandra Hoover; Caroline Chesneau-Guillemont; Fabienne Leroy; Undine Lehmann; Jörg Spieldenner; E-Siong Tee; Mike Gibney; Adam Drewnowski
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 5.614

8.  Measuring the Healthiness of the Packaged Food Supply in Australia.

Authors:  Michelle Crino; Gary Sacks; Elizabeth Dunford; Kathy Trieu; Jacqui Webster; Stefanie Vandevijvere; Boyd Swinburn; Jason Y Wu; Bruce Neal
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Comparative Analysis of the Classification of Food Products in the Mexican Market According to Seven Different Nutrient Profiling Systems.

Authors:  Alejandra Contreras-Manzano; Alejandra Jáuregui; Anabel Velasco-Bernal; Jorge Vargas-Meza; Juan A Rivera; Lizbeth Tolentino-Mayo; Simón Barquera
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  A simple visual model to compare existing nutrient profiling schemes.

Authors:  Hans Verhagen; Henk van den Berg
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 3.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.