Literature DB >> 18083790

Clinical predictors of disease progression and medication initiation in untreated patients with type 2 diabetes and A1C less than 7%.

Lydie Nkwimi Pani1, David Matthew Nathan, Richard William Grant.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Many patients with early diabetes remain untreated. Our objectives were to identify clinical predictors of 1) worsening glycemic control and 2) medical treatment initiation in response to worsening glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified 5,804 type 2 diabetic patients seen at least twice between June 2005 and June 2006 within our 12-clinic primary care network. We examined predictors of diabetes progression (A1C >or=7% or initiation of hypoglycemic agent) over a 1-year follow-up period in 705 patients who had A1C <7% and were not on glucose-lowering medications at baseline. In the 200 patients in this group who progressed, we examined predictors of medical therapy initiation.
RESULTS: In multivariate analyses, baseline A1C (P < 0.0001), younger age (P = 0.04), and weight gain (P = 0.03) were independent predictors of progression after adjusting for race, sex, and baseline HDL levels. Each decade of increasing age reduced the risk of progression by 15%. Each 1-lb increase in weight was associated with a 2% increased odds of progression. Likelihood of medication initiation among progressors decreased by 40% (P = 0.02) with every decade of age and decreased by 2.3% (P = 0.02) with each 1-mg/dl decrease in LDL level from baseline after adjusting for race, sex, and weight change.
CONCLUSIONS: Among untreated primary care patients with type 2 diabetes and A1C <7%, younger patients and those with weight gain were more likely to have diabetes progression and should be the focus of aggressive diabetes management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18083790      PMCID: PMC3829640          DOI: 10.2337/dc07-1934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  26 in total

1.  Primary care physicians who treat blacks and whites.

Authors:  Peter B Bach; Hoangmai H Pham; Deborah Schrag; Ramsey C Tate; J Lee Hargraves
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Clinical inertia in the management of Type 2 diabetes metabolic risk factors.

Authors:  R W Grant; E Cagliero; A K Dubey; C Gildesgame; H C Chueh; M J Barry; D E Singer; D M Nathan; J B Meigs
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.359

Review 3.  Aging and insulin secretion.

Authors:  Annette M Chang; Jeffrey B Halter
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.310

4.  The physiological significance of the glucose intolerance of aging.

Authors:  R I Fink; O G Kolterman; J M Olefsky
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1984-05

5.  Retinopathy and nephropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes four years after a trial of intensive therapy.

Authors:  John M Lachin; Saul Genuth; Patricia Cleary; Matthew D Davis; David M Nathan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-02-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Glycated hemoglobin standardization--National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) perspective.

Authors:  Randie R Little
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Patient characteristics do not predict poor glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes patients treated in primary care.

Authors:  Alex N Goudswaard; Ronald P Stolk; Peter Zuithoff; Guy E H M Rutten
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  A controlled trial of population management: diabetes mellitus: putting evidence into practice (DM-PEP).

Authors:  Richard W Grant; Enrico Cagliero; Christine M Sullivan; Anil K Dubey; Greg A Estey; Eric M Weil; Joseph Gesmundo; David M Nathan; Daniel E Singer; Henry C Chueh; James B Meigs
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Predictors of type 2 diabetes and diabetes-related hospitalisation in an Australian Aboriginal cohort.

Authors:  Valerie Burke; Yun Zhao; Andy H Lee; Ernest Hunter; Randolph M Spargo; Michael Gracey; Richard M Smith; Lawrie J Beilin; Ian B Puddey
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 5.602

10.  Labile glycosylated hemoglobin contributes to hemoglobin A1 as measured by liquid chromatography or electrophoresis.

Authors:  D M Nathan
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 8.327

View more
  25 in total

1.  Trajectories of Glycemic Change in a National Cohort of Adults With Previously Controlled Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Rozalina G McCoy; Che Ngufor; Holly K Van Houten; Brian Caffo; Nilay D Shah
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Changes in glycemic control from 1996 to 2006 among adults with type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Karen J Blumenthal; Mary E Larkin; Gail Winning; David M Nathan; Richard W Grant
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Prevalence of elevated hemoglobin A1c among patients admitted to the hospital without a diagnosis of diabetes.

Authors:  Deborah J Wexler; David M Nathan; Richard W Grant; Susan Regan; Allison L Van Leuvan; Enrico Cagliero
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Stacked classifiers for individualized prediction of glycemic control following initiation of metformin therapy in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Dennis H Murphree; Elaheh Arabmakki; Che Ngufor; Curtis B Storlie; Rozalina G McCoy
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.589

5.  Physician reasons for nonpharmacologic treatment of hyperglycemia in older patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Elizabeth Marrett; Qiaoyi Zhang; Claudia Kanitscheider; Michael J Davies; Larry Radican; Mark N Feinglos
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 2.945

6.  Double-blind, randomized, multicentre, and active comparator controlled investigation of the effect of pioglitazone, metformin, and the combination of both on cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving stable basal insulin therapy: the PIOCOMB study.

Authors:  Markolf Hanefeld; Andreas Pfützner; Thomas Forst; Iris Kleine; Winfried Fuchs
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 9.951

7.  Reasons given by general practitioners for non-treatment decisions in younger and older patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus in the United Kingdom: a survey study.

Authors:  Qiaoyi Zhang; Elizabeth Marrett; Kevin Jameson; Susanne Meiler; Michael J Davies; Larry Radican; Alan J Sinclair
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 2.763

8.  Defining and characterizing the progression of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Vivian A Fonseca
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Secondary failure of metformin monotherapy in clinical practice.

Authors:  Jonathan B Brown; Christopher Conner; Gregory A Nichols
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Validation of obesity-related diagnosis codes in claims data.

Authors:  Karine Suissa; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Kueiyu Joshua Lin; Gregory Brill; Seoyoung C Kim; Elisabetta Patorno
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 6.577

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.