Literature DB >> 15451891

A controlled trial of population management: diabetes mellitus: putting evidence into practice (DM-PEP).

Richard W Grant1, Enrico Cagliero, Christine M Sullivan, Anil K Dubey, Greg A Estey, Eric M Weil, Joseph Gesmundo, David M Nathan, Daniel E Singer, Henry C Chueh, James B Meigs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Population-level strategies to organize and deliver care may improve diabetes management. We conducted a multiclinic controlled trial of population management in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We created diabetic patient registries (n = 3,079) for four primary care clinics within a single academic health center. In the intervention clinic (n = 898), a nurse practitioner used novel clinical software (PopMan) to identify patients on a weekly basis with outlying values for visit and testing intervals and last measured levels of HbA1c, LDL cholesterol, and blood pressure. For these patients, the nurse practitioner e-mailed a concise patient-specific summary of evidence-based management suggestions directly to primary care providers (PCPs). Population changes in risk factor testing, medication prescription, and risk factor levels from baseline (1 January 2000 to 31 August 2001) to follow-up (1 December 2001 to 31 July 2003) were compared with the three usual-care control clinics (n = 2,181).
RESULTS: Patients had a mean age of 65 years, were mostly white (81%), and the majority were insured by Medicare/Medicaid (62%). From baseline to follow-up, the increase in proportion of patients tested for HbA1c (P = 0.004) and LDL cholesterol (P < 0.001) was greater in the intervention than control sites. Improvements in diabetes-related medication prescription and levels of HbA1c, LDL cholesterol, and blood pressure in the intervention clinic were balanced by similar improvements in the control sites.
CONCLUSIONS: Population-level clinical registries combined with summarized recommendations to PCPs had a modest effect on management. The intervention was limited by good overall quality of care at baseline and temporal improvements in all control clinics. It is unknown whether this intervention would have had greater impact in clinical settings with lower overall quality. Further research into more effective methods of translating population registry information into action is required. Copyright 2004 American Diabetes Association

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15451891     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.27.10.2299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  33 in total

1.  Evaluating Diabetes Outcomes and Costs Within an Ambulatory Setting: A Strategic Approach Utilizing a Clinical Decision Support System.

Authors:  Victoria Oxendine; Albert Meyer; Paula V Reid; Ashley Adams; Valerie Sabol
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2014-07

2.  Disparities in Quality of Primary Care by Resident and Staff Physicians: Is There a Conflict Between Training and Equity?

Authors:  Utibe R Essien; Wei He; Alaka Ray; Yuchiao Chang; Jonathan R Abraham; Daniel E Singer; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Internet use among primary care patients with type 2 diabetes: the generation and education gap.

Authors:  Richard W Grant; Enrico Cagliero; Henry C Chueh; James B Meigs
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Testing electronic algorithms to create disease registries in a safety net system.

Authors:  Rebecca Hanratty; Raymond O Estacio; L Miriam Dickinson; Vijayalaxmi Chandramouli; John F Steiner; Edward P Havranek
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2008-05

Review 5.  Electronic health records and the evolution of diabetes care: a narrative review.

Authors:  Vishal Patel; Mary E Reed; Richard W Grant
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-02-23

6.  Who are your patients with diabetes?: EMR case definitions in the Canadian primary care setting.

Authors:  Michelle Greiver; Karim Keshavjee; Ken Martin; Babak Aliarzadeh
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 7.  Rational use of electronic health records for diabetes population management.

Authors:  Emma M Eggleston; Michael Klompas
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.810

8.  Identifying primary care patients at risk for future diabetes and cardiovascular disease using electronic health records.

Authors:  Marie-France Hivert; Richard W Grant; Peter Shrader; James B Meigs
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Documentation of body mass index and control of associated risk factors in a large primary care network.

Authors:  Stephanie A Rose; Alexander Turchin; Richard W Grant; James B Meigs
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 10.  Effectiveness of IT-based diabetes management interventions: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Beth M Costa; Kristine J Fitzgerald; Kay M Jones; Trisha Dunning Am
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.