Literature DB >> 18083496

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring for intramedullary spinal-cord tumor surgery.

K F Kothbauer1.   

Abstract

During resection of intramedullary spinal-cord tumors intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring has become a true surgical technology. Motor evoked potentials are the most important modality for this purpose. Its use requires neurophysiological expertise from the surgeon, and a monitoring team in place able to handle the necessary equipment. Motor potentials are evoked by transcranial electrical motor cortex stimulation. A "single stimulus technique" evokes D-waves recorded from the spinal cord. The "multipulse (or train) stimulation technique" evokes electromyographic responses in peripheral muscles. These are optimally recorded from the thenar, hypothenar, tibialis anterior, and flexor hallucis brevis muscles, which are known to have strong pyramidal innervation. D-wave monitoring looks primarily at the peak-to-peak amplitude. When monitoring muscle MEPs, the presence or absence of the response irrespective of stimulation intensity is the important parameter. Preparations for neurophysiological monitoring fit quite well into a neurosurgical operating room environment. Recording and interpretation of MEPs is fast and straightforward. Pre- and postoperative clinical motor findings correlate with intraoperative MEP results. Thus correct prediction of the clinical status at a given time during surgery is possible with a very high certainty. The sensitivity of muscle MEPs for postoperative motor deficits is nearly 100%, its specificity is about 90%. Thus MEP data indeed reflect the clinical "reality". Present and stable recordings document intact motor pathways and allow the surgeon to confidently proceed with a tumor resection. Loss of muscle MEPs and/or decrease of the D-wave amplitude constitutes a "window of warning". It reflects a pattern of MEP change indicating a reversible injury to the essential motor pathways. Using this information, the surgical strategy can be adapted before irreversible neurological damage is caused by the surgical manipulation. Such adaptation comprises simply waiting for the recordings to spontaneously improve again, irrigating with warm saline solution to wash out blocking potassium. Other measures include the elevation of mean arterial pressure to improve local perfusion. Even staged resection can be considered if intraoperative measures do not sufficiently improve the recordings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18083496     DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2007.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurophysiol Clin        ISSN: 0987-7053            Impact factor:   3.734


  23 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Jong-Hwa Park; Seung-Jae Hyun
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Indication and technical implementation of the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgeries-a transnational survey in the German-speaking countries.

Authors:  Sebastian Siller; Constance Raith; Stefan Zausinger; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Andrea Szelenyi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 3.  Image guidance and neuromonitoring in neurosurgery.

Authors:  Wai Hoe Ng; Karim Mukhida; James T Rutka
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Cannabinoid-induced alteration of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) prior to intradural spinal tumor removal: a nasty surprise.

Authors:  Etienne Pralong; Rodolfo Maduri; Roy T Daniel; Mahmoud Messerer
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Detection of ischemia in endovascular therapy of cerebral aneurysms: a perspective in the era of neurophysiological monitoring.

Authors:  Lukui Chen; Robert F Spetzler; Cameron G McDougall; Felipe C Albuquerque; Bainan Xu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 6.  [Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring with evoked potentials].

Authors:  R Nitzschke; N Hansen-Algenstaedt; J Regelsberger; A E Goetz; M S Goepfert
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Surgical treatment of primary spinal tumors in the conus medullaris.

Authors:  In-Ho Han; Sung-Uk Kuh; Dong-Kyu Chin; Keun-Su Kim; Byung-Ho Jin; Yong-Eun Cho
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2008-08-30

8.  Lateral spread response monitoring during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. Comparison of two targets of partial neuromuscular blockade.

Authors:  Y H Chung; W H Kim; J J Lee; S-I Yang; S H Lim; D W Seo; K Park; I S Chung
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Intraoperative changes in transcranial motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials predicting outcome in children with intramedullary spinal cord tumors.

Authors:  Jason S Cheng; Michael E Ivan; Christopher J Stapleton; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Nalin Gupta; Kurtis I Auguste
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Detection of ischemia in endovascular therapy of cerebral aneurysms: a perspective in the era of neurophysiological monitoring.

Authors:  Lukui Chen
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.