BACKGROUND: Disparities in health outcomes and health behaviors may be partially explained by neighborhood environments that are poor in resources that could support healthy behaviors. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that low-income and high-minority neighborhoods have less access to public parks, open space, and private recreation facilities. METHODS: From 2004 to 2005, an inventory of 351 private recreation facilities and 465 public parks was conducted in 833 Census block groups in Maryland. In 2-way ANCOVAs, numbers of private facilities and public parks, as well as maximum park size, were studied in relation to categories of median income and percent non-white population in the block groups. RESULTS: For the number of private recreation facilities, there was no significant effect of income or percent minority. For number and size of parks, the interaction between income and percent minority was significant. Mixed-race neighborhoods had the highest number of parks, regardless of income. Low- and middle-income groups living in mostly-white block groups and high-income groups living in mostly-minority block groups had the lowest access to public parks. CONCLUSIONS: The expected deprivation of recreation facilities in low-income and high-minority neighborhoods was not found. There are exceptions to the inequalities found nationally, so the policies or practices associated with a fairer distribution of recreation resources in some local areas need to be better understood.
BACKGROUND: Disparities in health outcomes and health behaviors may be partially explained by neighborhood environments that are poor in resources that could support healthy behaviors. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that low-income and high-minority neighborhoods have less access to public parks, open space, and private recreation facilities. METHODS: From 2004 to 2005, an inventory of 351 private recreation facilities and 465 public parks was conducted in 833 Census block groups in Maryland. In 2-way ANCOVAs, numbers of private facilities and public parks, as well as maximum park size, were studied in relation to categories of median income and percent non-white population in the block groups. RESULTS: For the number of private recreation facilities, there was no significant effect of income or percent minority. For number and size of parks, the interaction between income and percent minority was significant. Mixed-race neighborhoods had the highest number of parks, regardless of income. Low- and middle-income groups living in mostly-white block groups and high-income groups living in mostly-minority block groups had the lowest access to public parks. CONCLUSIONS: The expected deprivation of recreation facilities in low-income and high-minority neighborhoods was not found. There are exceptions to the inequalities found nationally, so the policies or practices associated with a fairer distribution of recreation resources in some local areas need to be better understood.
Authors: James J Burns; Sarah Goff; Greg Karamian; Coleen Walsh; Lela Hobby; Jane Garb Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2011 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Melissa J Smiley; Ana V Diez Roux; Shannon J Brines; Daniel G Brown; Kelly R Evenson; Daniel A Rodriguez Journal: Health Place Date: 2010-05-15 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Richard Robert Suminski; Ding Ding; Rebecca Lee; Linda May; Tonya Tota; David Dinius Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Tanya K Kaufman; Andrew Rundle; Kathryn M Neckerman; Daniel M Sheehan; Gina S Lovasi; Jana A Hirsch Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Sydney A Jones; Latetia V Moore; Kari Moore; Melissa Zagorski; Shannon J Brines; Ana V Diez Roux; Kelly R Evenson Journal: Prev Med Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Andrew R Maroko; Juliana A Maantay; Nancy L Sohler; Kristen L Grady; Peter S Arno Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2009-06-22 Impact factor: 3.918