Literature DB >> 18082837

What are current preprocedure imaging requirements for carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy: have magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomographic angiography made a difference?

Thomas S Maldonado1.   

Abstract

Determination of degree of carotid artery stenosis is of critical importance when deciding whether a patient warrants surgical intervention. While angiography is still considered by some to be the true reference standard for imaging the internal carotid artery (ICA), physicians rely most commonly on duplex imaging when planning for endarterectomy. It is noninvasive, safe, and overall reliable for grading stenosis but is nevertheless user-dependent and can be limited in cases of severe calcification. Moreover, a lack of consensus for duplex criteria can be confounding. In recent years, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and computed tomographic angiography (CTA) have assumed a more prominent role in the preoperative planning for treatment of carotid stenosis. Improved resolution and faster acquisition times for both of these imaging modalities have allowed for accurate depictions of degree of stenosis, as well as plaque characterization. CTA and MRA may have special relevance in the era of carotid stenting, since challenging arch anatomy and identification of a high-risk vulnerable plaque may be useful when deciding whether to perform a stent procedure or endarterectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18082837     DOI: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2007.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0895-7967            Impact factor:   1.000


  8 in total

Review 1.  Update on surgical management for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Margaret H Walkup; Peter L Faries
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  MR angiography at 3 Tesla to assess proximal internal carotid artery stenoses: contrast-enhanced or 3D time-of-flight MR angiography?

Authors:  J Weber; P Veith; B Jung; G Ihorst; O Moske-Eick; S Meckel; H Urbach; C A Taschner
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.649

3.  [Traumatic dissection of carotid arteries caused by high energy motorcycle accident].

Authors:  S Brand; O E Teebken; P Bolzen; F Hildebrand; M Wilhelmi; C Krettek; C Probst
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Systematic review of preoperative carotid duplex ultrasound compared with computed tomography carotid angiography for carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  T Forjoe; M Asad Rahi
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Carotid duplex criteria for patients with contralateral occlusion.

Authors:  Joshua E Preiss; Dina S Itum; James G Reeves; Yazan Duwaryi; Ravi Rajani; Ravi Veeraswamy; Atef Salam; Thomas F Dodson; Luke P Brewster
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Safe carotid endarterectomy: "one fits all strategy".

Authors:  Ahmet Unlu; Ahmet Baris Durukan
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2020-09-23

7.  Carotid Endarterectomy: experience in 8743 cases.

Authors:  R Chiesa; G Melissano; R Castellano; Y Tshomba; E M Marone; E Civilini; D Astore; F Calliari; B Catenaccio; G Coppi; A Carozzo; R Mennella
Journal:  HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth       Date:  2009

Review 8.  The management of carotid restenosis: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Francesco Stilo; Nunzio Montelione; Rosalinda Calandrelli; Marisa Distefano; Francesco Spinelli; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Fabio Pilato
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.