Literature DB >> 18082700

Robotic fundoplication in children: resident teaching and a single institutional review of our first 50 patients.

John J Meehan1, Tammy D Meehan, Anthony Sandler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery is a new technology that may eventually replace laparoscopy in treating many surgical issues in children. Resident education using robotic surgery has been a concern for many institutions. We present our first 50 consecutive robotic fundoplications in children and our teaching experience with this procedure.
METHOD: A 3-arm surgical robot was used to create a Nissen fundoplication with 1 additional port for liver retraction. Although there were exceptions, a 12-mm 3-dimensional camera was used in most patients greater than 10 kg, and a 5-mm 2-dimensional camera if less than 10 kg. Robotic instruments were either 8 or 5 mm. An accessory port was used for liver retraction. The console surgeon was either an attending surgeon or a fourth-year general surgery resident. The general surgery residents had limited prior minimally invasive experience consisting of cholecystectomies, appendectomies, and a few other procedures.
RESULTS: Average age was 5.1 years (range, 1 month to 16 years). Average weight was 19.5 kg (range, 2.7-96.4 kg). No open conversions or intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperative complications included ileus (4%), dysphagia (4%), a G-tube site wound infection (2%), gas bloat syndrome (2%), and 1 wrap breakdown 3 years after the initial procedure (2%). Operative times for staff surgeons were down to 90 minutes after 5 fundoplications.
CONCLUSION: Robotic fundoplication is an acceptable method to perform minimally invasive antireflux surgery in children. Resident education and teaching can be readily accomplished using the robot and the learning curve is relatively short and steep.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18082700     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.08.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  7 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted surgery in children: advantages and limitations.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Al-Bassam
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-04-10

2.  Anesthesia experience of pediatric robotic surgery in a University Hospital.

Authors:  Wadha Mubarak Alotaibi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-06-13

3.  Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted Nissen fundoplication in an infant pig model.

Authors:  Alexandra Krauss; Thomas Neumuth; Robin Wachowiak; Bernd Donaubauer; Werner Korb; Oliver Burgert; Oliver J Muensterer
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Robotics versus laparoscopy--an experimental study of the transfer effect in maiden users.

Authors:  Magnus Anderberg; Johan Larsson; Christina C Kockum; Einar Arnbjörnsson
Journal:  Ann Surg Innov Res       Date:  2010-04-06

5.  How to successfully implement a robotic pediatric surgery program: lessons learned after 96 procedures.

Authors:  Guénolée de Lambert; Laurent Fourcade; Joachim Centi; Fabien Fredon; Karim Braik; Caroline Szwarc; Bernard Longis; Hubert Lardy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Robotic Surgery: Is There a Possibility of Increasing Its Application in Pediatric Settings? A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Edoardo Bindi; Camilla Todesco; Fabiano Nino; Giovanni Torino; Gianluca Gentilucci; Giovanni Cobellis
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-08

7.  Ten years of paediatric robotic surgery: Lessons learned.

Authors:  Martin Salö; Linda Bonnor; Christina Graneli; Pernilla Stenström; Magnus Anderberg
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 2.483

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.