Literature DB >> 18082359

Use of the palliative outcome scale in Argentina: a cross-cultural adaptation and validation study.

Jorge H Eisenchlas1, Richard Harding, María Laura Daud, Marisa Pérez, Gustavo G De Simone, Irene J Higginson.   

Abstract

Although measuring outcomes is essential to ensuring palliative care effectiveness, there is an absence of properly validated measures in many countries. We undertook a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Palliative Outcome Scale (POS) into a Spanish (Argentina) language and cultural context. The methodology used a sequence of phases: 1) verification of conceptual equivalence (literature review, professional interviews, and patient focus groups); 2) multiple translations; 3) committee review; and 4) field testing. Psychometric analysis entailed evaluation of quantitative content validity, construct validity, staff and patients' ratings comparison, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness to change. Conceptual equivalence was achieved. Multiple changes were introduced after the translations and field testing in 65 patients and 20 professionals. Content validity was high for all but one item. Construct validity against a validated quality-of-life measure (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C-30) was confirmed (rho=0.74, P<0.0005). There was acceptable agreement between staff and patients (Cohen's weighted kappa >0.3) for 5/10, 8/10, and 6/9 items at each of three time-point evaluations and good correlation for all but one item (Spearman coefficient >0.7). Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's alpha=0.68-0.69 and 0.66-0.73) for patient and staff ratings, respectively, and test-retest reliability showed very high agreement for every item (>0.80). The Argentine POS showed adequate responsiveness to change, although significant difference was reached for only 3 out of 10 items for patients and staff, respectively. Completion of the POS did not take more than 12 and 6 minutes for patients and staff, respectively. This study indicates that the Argentine POS is a valid and reliable measure of palliative care outcomes with advanced cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18082359     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  7 in total

1.  Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS) in Adult Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Masoud Sirati Nir; Maryam Rassouli; Abbas Ebadi; Soolmaz Moosavi; Maryam Pakseresht; Fatemeh Hasan Shiri; Hossein Souri; Morteza Nasiri; Maryam Karami; Armin Fereidouni; Salman Barasteh
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-28

2.  Clinical effectiveness of online training in palliative care of primary care physicians.

Authors:  Marta Pelayo-Alvarez; Santiago Perez-Hoyos; Yolanda Agra-Varela
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 3.  The Palliative Outcome Scale (POS) applied to clinical practice and research: an integrative review.

Authors:  Fernanda Capella Rugno; Marysia Mara Rodrigues do Prado De Carlo
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2016-08-15

Review 4.  A critical analysis of test-retest reliability in instrument validation studies of cancer patients under palliative care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Paiva; Eliane Marçon Barroso; Estela Cristina Carneseca; Cristiano de Pádua Souza; Felipe Thomé Dos Santos; Rossana Verónica Mendoza López; Sakamoto Bianca Ribeiro Paiva
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  A brief, patient- and proxy-reported outcome measure in advanced illness: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS).

Authors:  Fliss Em Murtagh; Christina Ramsenthaler; Alice Firth; Esther I Groeneveld; Natasha Lovell; Steffen T Simon; Johannes Denzel; Ping Guo; Florian Bernhardt; Eva Schildmann; Birgitt van Oorschot; Farina Hodiamont; Sabine Streitwieser; Irene J Higginson; Claudia Bausewein
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 4.762

6.  Translation and cultural adaptation of IPOS (integrated palliative care outcome scale) in Estonia.

Authors:  Merli Laissaar; Riina Hallik; Pille Sillaste; Ulvi Ragun; Mari-Leen Pärn; Kaiu Suija
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2021-01-28

7.  Validation of a core outcome measure for palliative care in Africa: the APCA African Palliative Outcome Scale.

Authors:  Richard Harding; Lucy Selman; Godfrey Agupio; Natalya Dinat; Julia Downing; Liz Gwyther; Thandi Mashao; Keletso Mmoledi; Tony Moll; Lydia Mpanga Sebuyira; Barbara Panjatovic; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 3.186

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.