PURPOSE: To detect a predictive protein profile that distinguishes interleukin-2 therapy responders and nonresponders among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma we used surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Protein extracts from 56 patients with metastatic clear cell patients renal cell carcinoma obtained from radical nephrectomy specimens before interleukin-2 therapy were applied to protein chip arrays of different chromatographic properties and analyzed using surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. A class prediction algorithm was applied to identify a subset of protein peaks with expression values associated with interleukin-2 response status. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the association between the proteomic profile and interleukin-2 response status, controlling for the effect of lymphadenopathy. RESULTS: From 513 protein peaks we discovered a predictor set of 11 that performed optimally for predicting interleukin-2 response status with 86% accuracy (Fisher's p <0.004, permutation p <0.01). Results were validated in an independent data set with 72% overall accuracy (p <0.05, permutation p <0.01). On multivariate analysis the proteomic profile was significantly associated with the interleukin-2 response when corrected for lymph node status (p <0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We identified and validated a proteomic pattern that is an independent predictor of the interleukin-2 response. The ability to predict the probability of the interleukin-2 response could permit targeted selection of the patients most likely to respond to interleukin-2, while avoiding unwanted toxicity in patients less likely to respond. This proteomic predictor has the potential to significantly aid clinicians in the decision making of appropriate therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
PURPOSE: To detect a predictive protein profile that distinguishes interleukin-2 therapy responders and nonresponders among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma we used surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Protein extracts from 56 patients with metastatic clear cell patientsrenal cell carcinoma obtained from radical nephrectomy specimens before interleukin-2 therapy were applied to protein chip arrays of different chromatographic properties and analyzed using surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. A class prediction algorithm was applied to identify a subset of protein peaks with expression values associated with interleukin-2 response status. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the association between the proteomic profile and interleukin-2 response status, controlling for the effect of lymphadenopathy. RESULTS: From 513 protein peaks we discovered a predictor set of 11 that performed optimally for predicting interleukin-2 response status with 86% accuracy (Fisher's p <0.004, permutation p <0.01). Results were validated in an independent data set with 72% overall accuracy (p <0.05, permutation p <0.01). On multivariate analysis the proteomic profile was significantly associated with the interleukin-2 response when corrected for lymph node status (p <0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We identified and validated a proteomic pattern that is an independent predictor of the interleukin-2 response. The ability to predict the probability of the interleukin-2 response could permit targeted selection of the patients most likely to respond to interleukin-2, while avoiding unwanted toxicity in patients less likely to respond. This proteomic predictor has the potential to significantly aid clinicians in the decision making of appropriate therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Authors: R C Flanigan; S E Salmon; B A Blumenstein; S I Bearman; V Roy; P C McGrath; J R Caton; N Munshi; E D Crawford Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-12-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A Zisman; A J Pantuck; F Dorey; J W Said; O Shvarts; D Quintana; B J Gitlitz; J B deKernion; R A Figlin; A S Belldegrun Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hyung L Kim; David Seligson; Xueli Liu; Nicolette Janzen; Matthew H T Bui; Hong Yu; Tao Shi; Robert A Figlin; Steve Horvath; Arie S Belldegrun Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-08-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Matthew H T Bui; David Seligson; Ken-ryu Han; Allan J Pantuck; Frederick J Dorey; Yunda Huang; Steve Horvath; Bradley C Leibovich; Shefali Chopra; Shu-Yuan Liao; Eric Stanbridge; Michael I Lerman; Aarno Palotie; Robert A Figlin; Arie S Belldegrun Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Bradley C Leibovich; Ken-ryu Han; Matthew H T Bui; Allan J Pantuck; Frederick J Dorey; Robert A Figlin; Arie Belldegrun Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Allan J Pantuck; Amnon Zisman; Frederich Dorey; Debby H Chao; Ken-Ryu Han; Jonathan Said; Barbara Gitlitz; Arie S Belldegrun; Robert A Figlin Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Igor Frank; Michael L Blute; John C Cheville; Christine M Lohse; Amy L Weaver; Horst Zincke Journal: J Urol Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Luiz Fernando Zerbini; Manoj K Bhasin; Jaira F de Vasconcellos; Juliano D Paccez; Xuesong Gu; Andrew L Kung; Towia A Libermann Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2014-05-01 Impact factor: 6.261