INTRODUCTION: Patients who have a temporary loop ileostomy have impaired quality of life. Complications associated with a loop ileostomy or ileostomy closure will impair patients' quality of life further and require extended enterostomal therapy. We performed a prospective audit of loop ileostomy to ascertain the nature of the workload that may be created with ileostomy-related complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty patients (67 males, 73 females, median age 50 years, range 5-90 years) who received a temporary loop ileostomy were analysed after completion of proformas on a prospective basis between 1999 and 2006. RESULTS: Operation was performed for rectal cancer 100 (71%), familial adenomatous polyposis 14 (10%), ulcerative colitis 21 (15%) and for trauma or Hirchsprung's disease 5 (3%). Complications of loop ileostomy were: retraction 1 (0.7%), ileostomy flux 11 (8%), stomal prolapse 1 (0.7%), parastomal hernia 1 (0.7%), paraileostomy abscess 4 (3%) and severe skin excoriation 9 (6%). The loop ileostomy was reversed in 117 (83%) at a median (range) of 13 weeks (1-60). Ileostomy closure-related complications were: small bowel fistula 1 (0.9%), small bowel obstruction 5 (4.3%) and a stitch sinus in 1 (0.9%). Five women developed recto-vaginal fistula (n=3; 2.6%), pouch-vaginal fistula (n=1; 0.9%) and pouch-anal fistula (n=1; 0.9%) that required extended enterostomal therapy, after loop ileostomy reversal. CONCLUSION: Nineteen percent of patients following creation of a loop ileostomy and 10.5% of patients after reversal of the ileostomy required extended enterostomal care by a specialized enterostomal therapist, which supported resumption of a normal life.
INTRODUCTION:Patients who have a temporary loop ileostomy have impaired quality of life. Complications associated with a loop ileostomy or ileostomy closure will impair patients' quality of life further and require extended enterostomal therapy. We performed a prospective audit of loop ileostomy to ascertain the nature of the workload that may be created with ileostomy-related complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty patients (67 males, 73 females, median age 50 years, range 5-90 years) who received a temporary loop ileostomy were analysed after completion of proformas on a prospective basis between 1999 and 2006. RESULTS: Operation was performed for rectal cancer 100 (71%), familial adenomatous polyposis 14 (10%), ulcerative colitis 21 (15%) and for trauma or Hirchsprung's disease 5 (3%). Complications of loop ileostomy were: retraction 1 (0.7%), ileostomy flux 11 (8%), stomal prolapse 1 (0.7%), parastomal hernia 1 (0.7%), paraileostomy abscess 4 (3%) and severe skin excoriation 9 (6%). The loop ileostomy was reversed in 117 (83%) at a median (range) of 13 weeks (1-60). Ileostomy closure-related complications were: small bowel fistula 1 (0.9%), small bowel obstruction 5 (4.3%) and a stitch sinus in 1 (0.9%). Five women developed recto-vaginal fistula (n=3; 2.6%), pouch-vaginal fistula (n=1; 0.9%) and pouch-anal fistula (n=1; 0.9%) that required extended enterostomal therapy, after loop ileostomy reversal. CONCLUSION: Nineteen percent of patients following creation of a loop ileostomy and 10.5% of patients after reversal of the ileostomy required extended enterostomal care by a specialized enterostomal therapist, which supported resumption of a normal life.
Authors: Antonio Caycedo-Marulanda; Sunil V Patel; Chris P Verschoor; Johanna P Uscategui; Sami A Chadi; Gabriela Moeslein; Manish Chand; Yasuko Maeda; John R T Monson; Steven D Wexner; Julio Mayol Journal: World J Surg Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 3.352