Literature DB >> 18081718

Clinical impact of nucleophosmin mutations and Flt3 internal tandem duplications in patients older than 60 yr with acute myeloid leukaemia.

Sebastian Scholl1, Claudia Theuer, Veit Scheble, Christa Kunert, Anita Heller, Lars-Olof Mügge, Hans-Joerg Fricke, Klaus Höffken, Ulrich Wedding.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nucleophosmin (NPM1) and Flt3 internal tandem duplications (Flt3-ITD mutations) represent the most frequent molecular aberrations in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). While NPM1 mutations are associated with favourable prognosis in younger AML patients, Flt3-ITD mutations reflect an unfavourable prognostic factor in these patients. So far, especially NPM1 mutations have not yet been evaluated exclusively in older patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the prevalence of NPM1 and Flt3-ITD mutations and its association with complete remission (CR), and survival in 99 elderly patients (median age 71 yr, range 60-85 yr) newly diagnosed for AML. Primary treatment approach was curative in 54, and palliative in 38 patients, while seven patients received best supportive care only. The mean follow-up of surviving patients was 600 d.
RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were tested negative for NPM1 and Flt3-ITD mutations (group 1), 16 patients carried only a NPM1 mutation (group 2) and nine patients had only a Flt3-ITD mutation (group 3) while additional seven patients were positive for both aberrations (group 4). We can demonstrate a significant higher rate of CR comparing wildtype vs. NPM1 positive patients (40.5% for group 1 vs. 80.0% for group 2, P = 0.03) for patients receiving curative therapy. Interestingly, there is no significant difference in overall survival between group 1 and group 2 (Log-rank test P = 0.22, median 440 d vs. 1125 d). In contrast, patients carrying a Flt3-ITD mutation had a significant worse overall survival compared to wildtype patients (P = 0.03, median 210 d for group 3 + 4 vs. 634 d for group 1 + 2) while no difference of CR rate could be observed (42.8% vs. 48.9%, P = 0.91).
CONCLUSION: As elderly but medically fit patients with AML carrying a NPM1 mutation have a high CR rate, age itself should not be a barrier for induction treatment. However, new therapeutic concepts of postremission therapy (e.g. allogeneic stem cell transplantation after dose-reduced conditioning) should be considered for these patients in first CR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18081718     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2007.01019.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Haematol        ISSN: 0902-4441            Impact factor:   2.997


  24 in total

1.  Influence of IDH on FLT3-ITD status in newly diagnosed AML.

Authors:  P Boddu; K Takahashi; N Pemmaraju; N Daver; C B Benton; S Pierce; M Konopleva; F Ravandi; J Cortes; H Kantarjian; C D DiNardo
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  TP53 mutations in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Masamitsu Yanada; Yukiya Yamamoto; Sachiko Iba; Akinao Okamoto; Yoko Inaguma; Masutaka Tokuda; Satoko Morishima; Tadaharu Kanie; Shuichi Mizuta; Yoshiki Akatsuka; Masataka Okamoto; Nobuhiko Emi
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.490

3.  Favorable prognostic impact of NPM1 mutations in older patients with cytogenetically normal de novo acute myeloid leukemia and associated gene- and microRNA-expression signatures: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.

Authors:  Heiko Becker; Guido Marcucci; Kati Maharry; Michael D Radmacher; Krzysztof Mrózek; Dean Margeson; Susan P Whitman; Yue-Zhong Wu; Sebastian Schwind; Peter Paschka; Bayard L Powell; Thomas H Carter; Jonathan E Kolitz; Meir Wetzler; Andrew J Carroll; Maria R Baer; Michael A Caligiuri; Richard A Larson; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  FLT3 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: what is the best approach in 2013?

Authors:  Mark Levis
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2013

5.  Prognostic significance of NPM1 mutations in the absence of FLT3-internal tandem duplication in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a SWOG and UK National Cancer Research Institute/Medical Research Council report.

Authors:  Fabiana Ostronoff; Megan Othus; Michelle Lazenby; Elihu Estey; Frederick R Appelbaum; Anna Evans; John Godwin; Amanda Gilkes; Kenneth J Kopecky; Alan Burnett; Alan F List; Min Fang; Vivian G Oehler; Stephen H Petersdorf; Era L Pogosova-Agadjanyan; Jerald P Radich; Cheryl L Willman; Soheil Meshinchi; Derek L Stirewalt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Genetic tests to evaluate prognosis and predict therapeutic response in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Margaret L Gulley; Thomas C Shea; Yuri Fedoriw
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 7.  Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the Elderly.

Authors:  Heidi D Klepin
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.076

8.  The prognostic relevance of flt3 and npm1 mutations on older patients treated intensively or non-intensively: a study of 1312 patients in the UK NCRI AML16 trial.

Authors:  M Lazenby; A F Gilkes; C Marrin; A Evans; R K Hills; A K Burnett
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia: establishment of indications on the basis of individual risk stratification.

Authors:  Axel Rolf Zander; Ulrike Bacher; Jürgen Finke
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  The prognostic impact of FLT3-ITD and NPM1 mutation in adult AML is age-dependent in the population-based setting.

Authors:  Gunnar Juliusson; Martin Jädersten; Stefan Deneberg; Sören Lehmann; Lars Möllgård; Lovisa Wennström; Petar Antunovic; Jörg Cammenga; Fryderyk Lorenz; Emma Ölander; Vladimir Lj Lazarevic; Martin Höglund
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-03-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.