Literature DB >> 25713434

Prognostic significance of NPM1 mutations in the absence of FLT3-internal tandem duplication in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a SWOG and UK National Cancer Research Institute/Medical Research Council report.

Fabiana Ostronoff1, Megan Othus2, Michelle Lazenby2, Elihu Estey2, Frederick R Appelbaum2, Anna Evans2, John Godwin2, Amanda Gilkes2, Kenneth J Kopecky2, Alan Burnett2, Alan F List2, Min Fang2, Vivian G Oehler2, Stephen H Petersdorf2, Era L Pogosova-Agadjanyan2, Jerald P Radich2, Cheryl L Willman2, Soheil Meshinchi2, Derek L Stirewalt2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) harboring NPM1 mutations without FLT3-internal tandem duplications (ITDs; NPM1-positive/FLT3-ITD-negative genotype) are classified as better risk; however, it remains uncertain whether this favorable classification can be applied to older patients with AML with this genotype. Therefore, we examined the impact of age on the prognostic significance of NPM1-positive/FLT3-ITD-negative status in older patients with AML. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with AML age ≥ 55 years treated with intensive chemotherapy as part of Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) and UK National Cancer Research Institute/Medical Research Council (NCRI/MRC) trials were evaluated. A comprehensive analysis first examined 156 patients treated in SWOG trials. Validation analyses then examined 1,258 patients treated in MRC/NCRI trials. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to determine the impact of age on the prognostic significance of NPM1 mutations, FLT3-ITDs, and the NPM1-positive/FLT3-ITD-negative genotype.
RESULTS: Patients with AML age 55 to 65 years with NPM1-positive/FLT3-ITD-negative genotype treated in SWOG trials had a significantly improved 2-year overall survival (OS) as compared with those without this genotype (70% v 32%; P < .001). Moreover, patients age 55 to 65 years with NPM1-positive/FLT3-ITD-negative genotype had a significantly improved 2-year OS as compared with those age > 65 years with this genotype (70% v 27%; P < .001); any potential survival benefit of this genotype in patients age > 65 years was marginal (27% v 16%; P = .33). In multivariable analysis, NPM1-positive/FLT3-ITD-negative genotype remained independently associated with an improved OS in patients age 55 to 65 years (P = .002) but not in those age > 65 years (P = .82). These results were confirmed in validation analyses examining the NCRI/MRC patients.
CONCLUSION: NPM1-positive/FLT3-ITD-negative genotype remains a relatively favorable prognostic factor for patients with AML age 55 to 65 years but not in those age > 65 years.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25713434      PMCID: PMC4372852          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.0571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  29 in total

1.  Clinical implications of FLT3 mutations in pediatric AML.

Authors:  Soheil Meshinchi; Todd A Alonzo; Derek L Stirewalt; Michel Zwaan; Martin Zimmerman; Dirk Reinhardt; Gertjan J L Kaspers; Nyla A Heerema; Robert Gerbing; Beverly J Lange; Jerald P Radich
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  The clinical spectrum of adult acute myeloid leukaemia associated with core binding factor translocations.

Authors:  Frederick R Appelbaum; Kenneth J Kopecky; Martin S Tallman; Marilyn L Slovak; Holly M Gundacker; Haesook T Kim; Gordon W Dewald; Hagop M Kantarjian; Sherry R Pierce; Elihu H Estey
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 6.998

3.  A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in elderly patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest oncology group study (9031).

Authors:  J E Godwin; K J Kopecky; D R Head; C L Willman; C P Leith; H E Hynes; S P Balcerzak; F R Appelbaum
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Cytoplasmic nucleophosmin in acute myelogenous leukemia with a normal karyotype.

Authors:  Brunangelo Falini; Cristina Mecucci; Enrico Tiacci; Myriam Alcalay; Roberto Rosati; Laura Pasqualucci; Roberta La Starza; Daniela Diverio; Emanuela Colombo; Antonella Santucci; Barbara Bigerna; Roberta Pacini; Alessandra Pucciarini; Arcangelo Liso; Marco Vignetti; Paola Fazi; Natalia Meani; Valentina Pettirossi; Giuseppe Saglio; Franco Mandelli; Francesco Lo-Coco; Pier-Giuseppe Pelicci; Massimo F Martelli
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Mutant nucleophosmin (NPM1) predicts favorable prognosis in younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia and normal cytogenetics: interaction with other gene mutations.

Authors:  Konstanze Döhner; Richard F Schlenk; Marianne Habdank; Claudia Scholl; Frank G Rücker; Andrea Corbacioglu; Lars Bullinger; Stefan Fröhling; Hartmut Döhner
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Age and acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Frederick R Appelbaum; Holly Gundacker; David R Head; Marilyn L Slovak; Cheryl L Willman; John E Godwin; Jeanne E Anderson; Stephen H Petersdorf
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Prevalence and prognostic impact of NPM1 mutations in 1485 adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Authors:  Christian Thiede; Sina Koch; Eva Creutzig; Christine Steudel; Thomas Illmer; Markus Schaich; Gerhard Ehninger
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Randomized comparison of DAT versus ADE as induction chemotherapy in children and younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Results of the Medical Research Council's 10th AML trial (MRC AML10). Adult and Childhood Leukaemia Working Parties of the Medical Research Council.

Authors:  I M Hann; R F Stevens; A H Goldstone; J K Rees; K Wheatley; R G Gray; A K Burnett
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Nucleophosmin gene mutations are predictors of favorable prognosis in acute myelogenous leukemia with a normal karyotype.

Authors:  Susanne Schnittger; Claudia Schoch; Wolfgang Kern; Cristina Mecucci; Claudia Tschulik; Massimo F Martelli; Torsten Haferlach; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Brunangelo Falini
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  No evidence that FLT3 status should be considered as an indicator for transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): an analysis of 1135 patients, excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia, from the UK MRC AML10 and 12 trials.

Authors:  Rosemary E Gale; Robert Hills; Panagiotis D Kottaridis; Sivatharsini Srirangan; Keith Wheatley; Alan K Burnett; David C Linch
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  49 in total

Review 1.  Molecular therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Catherine C Coombs; Martin S Tallman; Ross L Levine
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  When to obtain genomic data in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and which mutations matter.

Authors:  Gregory W Roloff; Elizabeth A Griffiths
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

3.  Genetic alterations and their clinical implications in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  C-H Tsai; H-A Hou; J-L Tang; C-Y Liu; C-C Lin; W-C Chou; M-H Tseng; Y-C Chiang; Y-Y Kuo; M-C Liu; C-W Liu; L-I Lin; W Tsay; M Yao; C-C Li; S-Y Huang; B-S Ko; S-C Hsu; C-Y Chen; C-T Lin; S-J Wu; H-F Tien
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 4.  Treatment ethics, quality of life and health economics in the management of hematopoietic malignancies in older patients.

Authors:  H J Deeg
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  NPM1 mutation is not associated with prolonged complete remission in acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with hypomethylating agents.

Authors:  Pedro Henrique Prata; Cécile Bally; Thomas Prebet; Christian Recher; Geoffroy Venton; Xavier Thomas; Emmanuel Raffoux; Arnaud Pigneux; Thomas Cluzeau; Judith Desoutter; Julie Gay; Claude Preudhomme; Pierre Fenaux; Lionel Adès
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 6.  When to obtain genomic data in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and which mutations matter.

Authors:  Gregory W Roloff; Elizabeth A Griffiths
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-13

7.  Peripheral blood minimal residual disease may replace bone marrow minimal residual disease as an immunophenotypic biomarker for impending relapse in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  W Zeijlemaker; A Kelder; Y J M Oussoren-Brockhoff; W J Scholten; A N Snel; D Veldhuizen; J Cloos; G J Ossenkoppele; G J Schuurhuis
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  TP53 mutations in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Masamitsu Yanada; Yukiya Yamamoto; Sachiko Iba; Akinao Okamoto; Yoko Inaguma; Masutaka Tokuda; Satoko Morishima; Tadaharu Kanie; Shuichi Mizuta; Yoshiki Akatsuka; Masataka Okamoto; Nobuhiko Emi
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.490

9.  Outcomes of older patients with NPM1-mutated AML: current treatments and the promise of venetoclax-based regimens.

Authors:  Curtis A Lachowiez; Sanam Loghavi; Tapan M Kadia; Naval Daver; Gautam Borthakur; Naveen Pemmaraju; Kiran Naqvi; Yesid Alvarado; Musa Yilmaz; Nicholas Short; Maro Ohanian; Sherry R Pierce; Keyur P Patel; Wei Qiao; Jing Ning; Koji Sasaki; Koichi Takahashi; Elias Jabbour; Michael Andreeff; Farhad Ravandi; Hagop M Kantarjian; Marina Konopleva; Courtney D DiNardo
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-04-14

10.  High NPM1-mutant allele burden at diagnosis predicts unfavorable outcomes in de novo AML.

Authors:  Sanjay S Patel; Frank C Kuo; Christopher J Gibson; David P Steensma; Robert J Soiffer; Edwin P Alyea; Yi-Bin A Chen; Amir T Fathi; Timothy A Graubert; Andrew M Brunner; Martha Wadleigh; Richard M Stone; Daniel J DeAngelo; Valentina Nardi; Robert P Hasserjian; Olga K Weinberg
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.