Literature DB >> 18081434

Critical values comparison: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes survey of 163 clinical laboratories.

Elizabeth A Wagar1, Richard C Friedberg, Rhona Souers, Ana K Stankovic.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Critical laboratory values are values that may be indicative of life-threatening conditions requiring rapid clinical intervention. Designation of critical values by clinical laboratories is required by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments and regulatory agencies. The development of critical values often involves consultation with clinical services. Also, questions are frequently asked about how critical values compare between institutions.
OBJECTIVE: To examine and compare critical value ranges for selected common critical value analytes. Additional specific questions addressed the source of these values, the inclusion of specific items on a critical values list, and the procedures for establishing such lists.
DESIGN: A total of 163 clinical laboratories provided critical values for potassium, calcium, magnesium, thyroid-stimulating hormone, hemoglobin, platelet count, and activated partial thromboplastin time. Collected data were subjected to analysis for statistical variation. A questionnaire regarding demographic characteristics, institutional practices, and critical values management was also completed by participants.
RESULTS: There was slight variation in pediatric and adult critical values used by the central 80% of study laboratories. Three areas of interest were noted: (1) 27% of laboratories allowed nonpractitioners to accept inpatient critical value reports, (2) there was nonconsensus regarding the handling of outpatient critical values during weekday versus evening/weekend hours, and (3) only 56% of respondents had a written critical values policy or procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric and adult critical values for the selected analytes were consistent in a comparison between the 163 clinical laboratories. Several weaknesses in current critical values management were identified. A consensus critical values list that may be of value to other institutions was assembled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18081434     DOI: 10.5858/2007-131-1769-CVCACO

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  17 in total

1.  Study of variables affecting critical value notification in a laboratory catering to tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  Rachna Agarwal; Neelam Chhillar; Chandra B Tripathi
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2013-11-26

2.  Critical laboratory values communication: summary recommendations from available guidelines.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Camilla Mattiuzzi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

3.  Predictive accuracy of serum total calcium for both critically high and critically low ionized calcium in critical illness.

Authors:  Zhi-De Hu; Yuan-Lan Huang; Mei-Ying Wang; Ge-Ji-Le Hu; Yan-Qiu Han
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Reporting critical laboratory values in hematology.

Authors:  Manjula Murari
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 5.  Consensus Statement for the Management and Communication of High Risk Laboratory Results.

Authors:  Craig Campbell; Grahame Caldwell; Penelope Coates; Robert Flatman; Andrew Georgiou; Andrea Rita Horvath; Que Lam; Hans Schneider
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2015-08

Review 6.  Pathology consultation on reporting of critical values.

Authors:  Jonathan R Genzen; Christopher A Tormey
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Towards harmonisation of critical laboratory result management - review of the literature and survey of australasian practices.

Authors:  Ca Campbell; Ar Horvath
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2012-11

8.  An evaluation of adult critical result policies in haematology in a teaching hospital in China.

Authors:  Dagan Yang; Qian Cai; Xinglun Qi; Lili Xu; Yunxian Zhou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-02

9.  Critical Value Reporting in Transfusion Medicine: A Survey of Communication Practices in US Facilities.

Authors:  Erika M Reese; Randin C Nelson; Willy A Flegel; Karen M Byrne; Garrett S Booth
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.493

10.  Analysis of laboratory repeat critical values at a large tertiary teaching hospital in China.

Authors:  Dagan Yang; Yunxian Zhou; Chunwei Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.