Literature DB >> 15645404

Clinical response to gastric electrical stimulation in patients with postsurgical gastroparesis.

Richard McCallum1, Zhiyue Lin, Paul Wetzel, Irene Sarosiek, Jameson Forster.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aim of this study was to report the long-term clinical response to high-frequency gastric electrical stimulation (GES) in 16 patients with postsurgical gastroparesis who failed standard medical therapy.
METHODS: Clinical data collected at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of GES included (1) severity and frequency of 6 upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms by using a 5-point symptom interview questionnaire and total symptom score, (2) health-related quality of life including physical composite score and mental composite score, (3) 4-hour standardized gastric emptying of a solid meal by scintigraphy, and (4) nutritional status.
RESULTS: The severity and frequency of all 6 upper GI symptoms, total symptom score, physical composite score, and mental composite score were significantly improved after 6 months and sustained at 12 months ( P < .05). All patients had delayed gastric emptying at baseline. Gastric emptying was not significantly faster at 12 months, although 3 normalized. At implantation, 7 of 16 patients required nutritional support with a feeding jejunostomy tube; after GES, 4 were able to discontinue jejunal feeding. The mean number of hospitalization days was significantly reduced by a mean 25 days compared with the prior year. One patient had the device removed after 12 months because of infection around the pulse generator.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term GES significantly improved upper GI symptoms, quality of life, the nutritional status, and hospitalization requirements of patients with postsurgical gastroparesis. Although vagal nerve damage or disruption was part of the underlying pathophysiology, GES therapy was still effective and is a potential treatment option for the long-term management of postsurgical gastroparesis. A controlled clinical trial of GES for PSG patients (who are refractory to medical therapy) is indicated given these encouraging results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15645404     DOI: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00605-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  30 in total

1.  Pacing the gut in motility disorders.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; J D Z Chen
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-07

Review 2.  Treatment options for patients with severe gastroparesis.

Authors:  Hasse Abrahamsson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Efficacy of gastric electrical stimulation in improving functional vomiting in patients with normal gastric emptying.

Authors:  Savio C Reddymasu; Zhiyue Lin; Irene Sarosiek; Jameson Forster; Richard W McCallum
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Gastroparesis: current diagnostic challenges and management considerations.

Authors:  Shamaila Waseem; Baharak Moshiree; Peter V Draganov
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis: a goal greatly pursued, but not yet attained.

Authors:  Mauro Bortolotti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Gastric electrical stimulation optimized to inhibit gastric motility reduces food intake in dogs.

Authors:  Geng-Qing Song; Hongbing Zhu; Yong Lei; Charlene Yuan; Warren Starkebaum; Jieyun Yin; Jiande D Z Chen
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Gastric electrical stimulation: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-08-01

8.  Dumping syndrome: establishing criteria for diagnosis and identifying new etiologies.

Authors:  Reza A Hejazi; Harshal Patil; Richard W McCallum
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Laparoscopic gastric electrical stimulation for medically refractory diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis.

Authors:  P Timratana; K El-Hayek; H Shimizu; M Kroh; B Chand
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Review article: gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis--physiological foundations, technical aspects and clinical implications.

Authors:  E Soffer; T Abell; Z Lin; A Lorincz; R McCallum; H Parkman; S Policker; T Ordog
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 8.171

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.