Literature DB >> 18080736

Intrauterine position effects on anogenital distance and digit ratio in male and female mice.

Peter L Hurd1, Allison A Bailey, Patricia A Gongal, Reginia H Yan, John J Greer, Silvia Pagliardini.   

Abstract

Anogenital distance (AGD) and the ratio of the second (index) to fourth (ring) digit lengths (2D:4D) are two widely used indicators of prenatal androgen exposure. The former is commonly used in rodent models, while the latter is principally used in human studies. We investigated variation in these two traits in C57BL/6J mice to test the hypothesis that variation in these two traits reflect a common underlying variable, presumably testosterone exposure. AGD is a sexually dimorphic trait used to sex young rodents. This distance typically increases and becomes more male-like in female pups when their uterine neighbors are male. 2D:4D is sexually dimorphic in a number of species, including humans and other great apes. Lower digit ratios may be associated with greater exposure to androgens during fetal development in humans. We found the expected sexual dimorphism in AGD, but no significant sex difference in 2D:4D, and no correlation between 2D:4D and AGD. Gestating next to males increased a pup's 2D:4D ratio, but it had no effect on AGD. The lack of correlation between 2D:4D and AGDs in this mouse strain suggests that these two measures do not reflect a common influence of androgen exposure. The possible roles of temporal and localized effects of masculinization are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18080736     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-007-9259-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  15 in total

1.  Evidence for sexually dimorphic associations between maternal characteristics and anogenital distance, a marker of reproductive development.

Authors:  Emily S Barrett; Lauren E Parlett; J Bruce Redmon; Shanna H Swan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  The role of genetics in estrogen responses: a critical piece of an intricate puzzle.

Authors:  Emma H Wall; Sylvia C Hewitt; Laure K Case; Chin-Yo Lin; Kenneth S Korach; Cory Teuscher
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Stability of proposed biomarkers of prenatal androgen exposure over the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  E S Barrett; L E Parlett; S H Swan
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Polytocus focus: Uterine position effect is dependent upon horn size.

Authors:  Kristen A McLaurin; Charles F Mactutus
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.457

5.  Environmental levels of oestrogenic and antiandrogenic compounds feminize digit ratios in male rats and their unexposed male progeny.

Authors:  Jacques Auger; Dominique Le Denmat; Raymond Berges; Ludivine Doridot; Benjamin Salmon; Marie Chantal Canivenc-Lavier; Florence Eustache
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sex differences in β-amyloid accumulation in 3xTg-AD mice: role of neonatal sex steroid hormone exposure.

Authors:  Jenna C Carroll; Emily R Rosario; Sara Kreimer; Angela Villamagna; Elisabet Gentzschein; Frank Z Stanczyk; Christian J Pike
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Effects of Prenatal Testosterone Exposure on Sexually Dimorphic Gene Expression in the Neonatal Mouse Cortex and Hippocampus.

Authors:  Chris Armoskus; Thomas Mota; Debbie Moreira; Houng-Wei Tsai
Journal:  J Steroids Horm Sci       Date:  2014-07-23

8.  Fingers as a marker of prenatal androgen exposure.

Authors:  Sheri A Berenbaum; Kristina Korman Bryk; Nicole Nowak; Charmian A Quigley; Scott Moffat
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 4.736

9.  Maternal and fetal factors that contribute to the localization of T regulatory cells during pregnancy.

Authors:  Carrie M Wambach; Sonal N Patel; Daniel A Kahn
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.886

10.  Digit ratio (2Dratio4D) differences between 20 strains of inbred mice.

Authors:  Reginia H Y Yan; Mark Bunning; Douglas Wahlsten; Peter L Hurd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.