Literature DB >> 18080095

The value of chemical fat-saturation pulse added to T1-weighted spin-echo sequence in evaluating gadolinium-enhancing brain lesions in multiple sclerosis.

F Sardanelli1, S Schiavoni, A Iozzelli, A Fausto, A Aliprandi, G L Mancardi, M Filippi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess the value of a chemical (spectral) fat-saturation (fat-sat) pulse added to a T1-weighted spin-echo sequence after intravenous administration of paramagnetic contrast agent in detecting enhancing lesions in multiple sclerosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis underwent a brain 1.0-Tesla magnetic resonance (MR) scan with T1-weighted spin-echo sequences (24 contiguous para-axial slices with a thickness of 5 mm, pixel size 0.96 mm(2), number of excitations 2, flip angle 90 degrees ) 5 min after intravenous injection of 0.1 mmol/kg of gadodiamide with and without fat-sat, acquired with randomised order of priority. Two readers counted by consensus the number of enhancing lesions and assigned a conspicuity score (low conspicuity=1; high conspicuity=2) to each enhancing lesion during a randomised reading without any visual comparison between the two corresponding images (with and without fat-sat) of the same patient. McNemar and Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank tests were used.
RESULTS: Seventy-two enhancing lesions without fat-sat and 94 with fat-sat were detected; 22 lesions were visible only with fat-sat, whereas no lesion was detected only without fat-sat (p<0.0001). The conspicuity score was 1.17+/-0.38 (mean+/-standard deviation) and 1.57+/-0.44, respectively (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: A fat-sat pulse added to a T1-weighted spin-echo sequence increases significantly the number and conspicuity of contrast-enhancing lesions in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18080095     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-007-0220-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  32 in total

1.  [Brain magnetic resonance with magnetization transfer in multiple sclerosis. Lesion hyperintensity before and after intravenous gadolinium administration].

Authors:  P Renzetti; R C Parodi; C Losacco; E Rosso; T Arcuri; F Sardanelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Accumulation of hypointense lesions ("black holes") on T1 spin-echo MRI correlates with disease progression in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  L Truyen; J H van Waesberghe; M A van Walderveen; B W van Oosten; C H Polman; O R Hommes; H J Adèr; F Barkhof
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  An evaluation of the significance of areas of intense signal in the MR brain images of patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  I J Namer; O Yu; Y Mauss; B E Dumitresco; J Chambron
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 4.  Fat suppression in MR imaging: techniques and pitfalls.

Authors:  E M Delfaut; J Beltran; G Johnson; J Rousseau; X Marchandise; A Cotten
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 5.  Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M Filippi
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.312

6.  Optic neuritis: MR imaging with combined fat- and water-suppression techniques.

Authors:  A Jackson; S Sheppard; R D Laitt; A Kassner; D Moriarty
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  MR imaging of bone marrow lesions: relative conspicuousness on T1-weighted, fat-suppressed T2-weighted, and STIR images.

Authors:  S A Mirowitz; P Apicella; W R Reinus; A M Hammerman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Evaluation of Gd-enhancement in brain MR of multiple sclerosis: image subtraction with and without magnetization transfer.

Authors:  F Sardanelli; C Losacco; A Iozzelli; P Renzetti; E Rosso; R C Parodi; M Bonetti; A Murialdo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  The contribution of magnetic resonance imaging to the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  F Fazekas; F Barkhof; M Filippi; R I Grossman; D K Li; W I McDonald; H F McFarland; D W Paty; J H Simon; J S Wolinsky; D H Miller
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1999-08-11       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W I McDonald; A Compston; G Edan; D Goodkin; H P Hartung; F D Lublin; H F McFarland; D W Paty; C H Polman; S C Reingold; M Sandberg-Wollheim; W Sibley; A Thompson; S van den Noort; B Y Weinshenker; J S Wolinsky
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pyrolytic graphite foam: a passive magnetic susceptibility matching material.

Authors:  Gary C Lee; Patrick W Goodwill; Kevin Phuong; Ben A Inglis; Greig C Scott; Brian A Hargreaves; Lizabeth Li; Alex C Chen; Rachana N Shah; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Diagnostic image quality of gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI with and without fat saturation in children with retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Selma Sirin; Marc Schlamann; Klaus A Metz; Norbert Bornfeld; Bernd Schweiger; Markus Holdt; Michael M Schuendeln; Simone Lohbeck; Andrej Krasny; Sophia L Goericke
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-01-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.