Literature DB >> 18079154

The burden of cancer at work: estimation as the first step to prevention.

L Rushton1, S Hutchings, T Brown.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Work-related cancers are largely preventable. The overall aim of this project is to estimate the current burden of cancer in Great Britain attributable to occupational factors, and identify carcinogenic agents, industries and occupations for targeting risk prevention.
METHODS: Attributable fractions and numbers were estimated for mortality and incidence for bladder, lung, non-melanoma skin, and sinonasal cancers, leukaemia and mesothelioma for agents and occupations classified as International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Group 1 and 2A carcinogens with "strong" or "suggestive" evidence for carcinogenicity at the specific cancer site in humans. Risk estimates were obtained from published literature and national data sources used for estimating proportions exposed.
RESULTS: In 2004, 78,237 men and 71,666 women died from cancer in Great Britain. Of these, 7317 (4.9%) deaths (men: 6259 (8%); women: 1058 (1.5%)) were estimated to be attributable to work-related carcinogens for the six cancers assessed. Incidence estimates were 13,338 (4.0%) registrations (men: 11,284 (6.7%); women 2054 (1.2%)). Asbestos contributed over half the occupational attributable deaths, followed by silica, diesel engine exhaust, radon, work as a painter, mineral oils in metal workers and in the printing industry, environmental tobacco smoke (non-smokers), work as a welder and dioxins. Occupational exposure to solar radiation, mineral oils and coal tars/pitches contributed 2557, 1867 and 550 skin cancer registrations, respectively. Industries/occupations with large numbers of deaths and/or registrations include construction, metal working, personal and household services, mining (not metals), land transport and services allied to transport, roofing, road repair/construction, printing, farming, the Armed Forces, some other service industry sectors and manufacture of transport equipment, fabricated metal products, machinery, non-ferrous metals and metal products, and chemicals.
CONCLUSIONS: Estimates for all but leukaemia are greater than those currently used in UK health and safety strategy planning and contrast with small numbers (200-240 annually) from occupational accidents. Sources of uncertainty in the estimates arise principally from approximate data and methodological issues. On balance, the estimates are likely to be a conservative estimate of the true risk. Long latency means that past high exposures will continue to give substantial numbers in the near future. Although levels of many exposures have reduced, recent measurements of others, such as wood dust and respirable quartz, show continuing high levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18079154     DOI: 10.1136/oem.2007.037002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  24 in total

1.  Cancer incidence among Swedish pulp and paper mill workers: a cohort study of sulphate and sulphite mills.

Authors:  Eva Andersson; Håkan Westberg; Ing-Liss Bryngelsson; Anders Magnuson; Bodil Persson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Increased risk of lung cancer associated with occupational exposure to benzidine and/or beta-naphthylamine.

Authors:  Kimiko Tomioka; Kenji Obayashi; Keigo Saeki; Nozomi Okamoto; Norio Kurumatani
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Reported skin cancer screening of US adult workers.

Authors:  William G LeBlanc; Liat Vidal; Robert S Kirsner; David J Lee; Alberto J Caban-Martinez; Kathryn E McCollister; Kristopher L Arheart; Katherine Chung-Bridges; Sharon Christ; John Clark; John E Lewis; Evelyn P Davila; Panta Rouhani; Lora E Fleming
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  New insights on occupational exposure and bladder cancer risk: a pooled analysis of two Italian case-control studies.

Authors:  Veronica Sciannameo; Angela Carta; Angelo d'Errico; Maria Teresa Giraudo; Francesca Fasanelli; Cecilia Arici; Milena Maule; Paolo Carnà; Paolo Destefanis; Luigi Rolle; Paolo Gontero; Giovanni Casetta; Andrea Zitella; Giuseppina Cucchiarale; Paolo Vineis; Stefano Porru; Carlotta Sacerdote; Fulvio Ricceri
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Authors' response to: qualitative job-exposure matrix--a tool for the quantification of population-attributable fractions for occupational lung carcinogens?

Authors:  Sara De Matteis; Dario Consonni; Jay H Lubin; Margaret Tucker; Susan Peters; Roel C H Vermeulen; Hans Kromhout; Pier Alberto Bertazzi; Neil E Caporaso; Angela C Pesatori; Sholom Wacholder; Maria Teresa Landi
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Varied exposure to carcinogenic, mutagenic, and reprotoxic (CMR) chemicals in occupational settings in France.

Authors:  Nathalie Havet; Alexis Penot; Magali Morelle; Lionel Perrier; Barbara Charbotel; Béatrice Fervers
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 7.  Work and its role in shaping the social gradient in health.

Authors:  Jane E Clougherty; Kerry Souza; Mark R Cullen
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Occupation and cancer in Britain.

Authors:  L Rushton; S Bagga; R Bevan; T P Brown; J W Cherrie; P Holmes; L Fortunato; R Slack; M Van Tongeren; C Young; S J Hutchings
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  The case for a global ban on asbestos.

Authors:  Joseph LaDou; Barry Castleman; Arthur Frank; Michael Gochfeld; Morris Greenberg; James Huff; Tushar Kant Joshi; Philip J Landrigan; Richard Lemen; Jonny Myers; Morando Soffritti; Colin L Soskolne; Ken Takahashi; Daniel Teitelbaum; Benedetto Terracini; Andrew Watterson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Invited commentary: the search for preventable causes of cardiovascular disease--whither work?

Authors:  Mark R Cullen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.