Literature DB >> 18078874

Acetabular revision with extensive allograft impaction and uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated implants. Results after 9 (7-11) years follow-up.

Lars Palm1, Sven-Arne Jacobsson, Joanna Kvist, Anna Lindholm, Andreas Ojersjö, Ingemar Ivarsson.   

Abstract

This is a clinical and radiographic review of 87 hips in 79 patients 9 (7-11) years after acetabular revision with extensive use of morselized allograft firmly impacted into localized defects as well as the entire acetabular cavity, followed by insertion of an uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated cup with supplementary screw fixation. The 9-year survival rate for the acetabular implant was 90.5% (95% CI, 83.4%-97.6%) with revision for any reason as end point and 94% (95% CI, 89%-99.1%) with revision for aseptic loosening as end point. Acetabular revision with massive allograft impaction and hydroxyapatite-coated implants show very promising results. The limited contact between implant and host bone does not seem to compromise implant survival in the 7- to 11-year perspective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18078874     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  11 in total

1.  Revision hip arthroplasty using impacted cancellous bone and cement: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Gowthaman Arumugam; Shashi Kumar Nanjayan; Conal Quah; Philip Wraighte; Peter Howard
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-09-23

2.  Clinical and radiographic assessment of cementless acetabular revision with morsellised allografts.

Authors:  Chuang Sun; Yong-Yun Lian; Yu-Hua Jin; Cheng-Bin Zhao; Shi-Qi Pan; Xue-Feng Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Method of fixation does not influence the overall risk of rerevision in first-time cup revisions.

Authors:  Maziar Mohaddes; Göran Garellick; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Biological fixation of total hip arthroplasty: Facts and factors.

Authors:  Raju Karuppal
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-06-15

Review 5.  Uncemented Cups and Impaction Bone Grafting for Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Review of Rationale, Indications, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Rocco D'Apolito; Luigi Zagra
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.748

6.  Effects of hydroxyapatite coating of cups used in hip revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stergios Lazarinis; Johan Kärrholm; Nils P Hailer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Revisions of extensive acetabular defects with impaction grafting and a cement cup.

Authors:  Nienke van Egmond; Daniel C J De Kam; Jean W M Gardeniers; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years.

Authors:  Ena Colo; Wim H C Rijnen; Jean W M Gardeniers; Albert van Kampen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Bone grafts, bone graft extenders, substitutes and enhancers for acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Luca Pierannunzii; Luigi Zagra
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-03-13

10.  Structural and Morselized Allografting Combined with a Cementless Cup for Acetabular Defects in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 4- to 14-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Hou-Tsung Chen; Cheng-Ta Wu; Tsan-Wen Huang; Hsin-Nung Shih; Jun-Wen Wang; Mel S Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.