BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Gene-based mutation screening is now available and has the potential to provide diagnostic confirmation or exclusion of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. This study illustrates its utility and limitations in the clinical setting. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Using a molecular diagnostic service, genomic DNA of one affected individual from each study family was screened for pathologic PKD1 and PKD2 mutations. Bidirectional sequencing was performed to identify sequence variants in all exons and splice junctions of both genes and to confirm the specific mutations in other family members. In two multiplex families, microsatellite markers were genotyped at both PDK1 and PKD2 loci, and pair-wise and multipoint linkage analysis was performed. RESULTS: Three of five probands studied were referred for assessment of renal cystic disease without a family history of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, and two others were younger at-risk members of families with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease being evaluated as living-related kidney donors. Gene-based mutation screening identified pathogenic mutations that provided confirmation or exclusion of disease in three probands, but in the other two, only unclassified variants were identified. In one proband in which mutation screening was indeterminate, DNA linkage studies provided strong evidence for disease exclusion. CONCLUSIONS: Gene-based mutation screening or DNA linkage analysis should be considered in individuals in whom the diagnosis of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease is uncertain because of a lack of family history or equivocal imaging results and in younger at-risk individuals who are being evaluated as living-related kidney donors.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Gene-based mutation screening is now available and has the potential to provide diagnostic confirmation or exclusion of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. This study illustrates its utility and limitations in the clinical setting. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Using a molecular diagnostic service, genomic DNA of one affected individual from each study family was screened for pathologic PKD1 and PKD2 mutations. Bidirectional sequencing was performed to identify sequence variants in all exons and splice junctions of both genes and to confirm the specific mutations in other family members. In two multiplex families, microsatellite markers were genotyped at both PDK1 and PKD2 loci, and pair-wise and multipoint linkage analysis was performed. RESULTS: Three of five probands studied were referred for assessment of renal cystic disease without a family history of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, and two others were younger at-risk members of families with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease being evaluated as living-related kidney donors. Gene-based mutation screening identified pathogenic mutations that provided confirmation or exclusion of disease in three probands, but in the other two, only unclassified variants were identified. In one proband in which mutation screening was indeterminate, DNA linkage studies provided strong evidence for disease exclusion. CONCLUSIONS: Gene-based mutation screening or DNA linkage analysis should be considered in individuals in whom the diagnosis of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease is uncertain because of a lack of family history or equivocal imaging results and in younger at-risk individuals who are being evaluated as living-related kidney donors.
Authors: Y Pei; A D Paterson; K R Wang; N He; D Hefferton; T Watnick; G G Germino; P Parfrey; S Somlo; P St George-Hyslop Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2001-01-10 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Riccardo Magistroni; Ning He; Kairong Wang; Robin Andrew; Ann Johnson; Patricia Gabow; Elizabeth Dicks; Patrick Parfrey; Roser Torra; Jose L San-Millan; Eliecer Coto; Marjan Van Dijk; Martijn Breuning; Dorien Peters; Nadja Bogdanova; Giulia Ligabue; Alberto Albertazzi; Nick Hateboer; Kyproula Demetriou; Alkis Pierides; Constantinos Deltas; Peter St George-Hyslop; David Ravine; York Pei Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Sandro Rossetti; Sarah Burton; Lana Strmecki; Gregory R Pond; Jośe L San Millán; Klaus Zerres; T Martin Barratt; Seza Ozen; Vicente E Torres; Erik J Bergstralh; Christopher G Winearls; Peter C Harris Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Sandro Rossetti; Dominique Chauveau; Denise Walker; Anand Saggar-Malik; Christopher G Winearls; Vicente E Torres; Peter C Harris Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Miguel A Garcia-Gonzalez; Jeffrey G Jones; Susan K Allen; Christopher M Palatucci; Sat D Batish; William K Seltzer; Zheng Lan; Erica Allen; Feng Qian; Xose M Lens; York Pei; Gregory G Germino; Terry J Watnick Journal: Mol Genet Metab Date: 2007-06-18 Impact factor: 4.797
Authors: Moumita Barua; Onur Cil; Andrew D Paterson; Kairon Wang; Ning He; Elizabeth Dicks; Patrick Parfrey; York Pei Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Caroline Robinson; Thomas F Hiemstra; Deborah Spencer; Sarah Waller; Laura Daboo; Fiona E Karet Frankl; Richard N Sandford Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2012-08-03 Impact factor: 2.388