Literature DB >> 18076012

Association between standard clinical and pathologic characteristics and the 21-gene recurrence score in breast cancer patients: a population-based study.

Ido Wolf1, Noa Ben-Baruch, Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Shulamit Rizel, Hadassa Goldberg, Neora Yaal-Hahoshen, Baruch Klein, David B Geffen, Bella Kaufman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay has been reported to accurately predict the risk of disease recurrence and chemotherapy benefit in women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, lymph node (LN)-negative breast cancer who are treated with tamoxifen. To the authors' knowledge, the association between the RS and clinicopathologic characteristics has been studied in randomized and case-control trials, but not in the general population.
METHODS: The authors analyzed the correlation between clinicopathologic breast cancer characteristics and RS among 300 consecutive Israeli patients who were referred to undergo the test between October 2004 and October 2006.
RESULTS: Low, intermediate, and high RS were noted in 109 patients (36%), 134 patients (45%), and 57 patients (19%), respectively. The median age of the patients was 54 years and the median tumor size was 1.6 cm. High tumor grade, low progesterone receptor expression, infiltrating ductal histology, and high HER-2 expression were found to be associated with a high RS, whereas patient age, tumor size, ER expression, and lymph node micrometastasis were found to correlate poorly with the RS. The ability of any of these variables, either alone or in combination, to predict the RS was limited. Similarly, neither commonly used guidelines nor the Adjuvant! Online software were found to be able to predict the RS.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suggest that neither standard clinicopathologic features nor commonly used assessment tools can reliably predict the RS among referred breast cancer patients compared with a clinical trial population. These data also may indicate the need for additional studies regarding the role of the RS among certain subsets of breast cancer patients, including those with noninfiltrating ductal carcinoma histology and the presence of lymph node micrometastasis. Cancer 2008. (c) 2007 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18076012     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score® with other risk assessment tools including the Nottingham Prognostic Index in the identification of patients with low-risk invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Maura Bríd Cotter; Alex Dakin; Aoife Maguire; Janice M Walshe; M John Kennedy; Barbara Dunne; Ciarán Ó Riain; Cecily M Quinn
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Physician survey of the effect of the 21-gene recurrence score assay results on treatment recommendations for patients with lymph node-positive, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Ruth Oratz; Benjamin Kim; Calvin Chao; Stanley Skrzypczak; Caron Ory; Roberto Bugarini; Michael Broder
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 3.  Differences between invasive lobular and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: results and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Romualdo Barroso-Sousa; Otto Metzger-Filho
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 8.168

4.  Improving communication of breast cancer recurrence risk.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Alice R Richman; Jessica T DeFrank; Valerie F Reyna; Lisa A Carey
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Gene expression profiling for guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in women with early breast cancer: an evidence-based and economic analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-12-01

6.  Evaluation of Oncotype DX Recurrence Score as a prognostic factor in Japanese women with estrogen receptor-positive, node-negative primary Stage I or IIA breast cancer.

Authors:  Kyoko Yorozuya; Toru Takeuchi; Miwa Yoshida; Yukako Mouri; Junko Kousaka; Kimihito Fujii; Shogo Nakano; Takashi Fukutomi; Kazuo Hara; Shu Ichihara; Yingsong Lin; Shogo Kikuchi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  Genomic and proteomic biomarkers for cancer: a multitude of opportunities.

Authors:  Michael A Tainsky
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-05-04

Review 8.  The impact of the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Josh J Carlson; Joshua A Roth
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  The clinical impact of 21-gene recurrence score on treatment decisions for patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer in Korea.

Authors:  Moo Hyun Lee; Wonshik Han; Jeong Eon Lee; Ku Sang Kim; Heeseung Park; Jongjin Kim; Soo Youn Bae; Hyun Joo Shin; Jong Won Lee; Eun Sook Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 4.679

10.  Prognostic value of gene signatures and proliferation in lymph-node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Kristin Jonsdottir; Jörg Assmus; Aida Slewa; Einar Gudlaugsson; Ivar Skaland; Jan P A Baak; Emiel A M Janssen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.