Literature DB >> 18075786

Economic evaluation of 21-gene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay in lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer in Japan.

Masahide Kondo1, Shu Ling Hoshi, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Hiroshi Yoshibayashi, Masakazu Toi.   

Abstract

The 21-gene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay with a patented algorithm is validated as a good predictor of prognosis and potential benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer, while its high cost raises concern about how to finance it. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing prevalent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline/St Gallen recommendation-guided treatment with the assay-guided treatment is carried out with budget impact estimation in the context of Japan's health care system. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios are estimated as 2,997,495 yen/QALY (26,065 US$/QALY) in the comparison between NCCN guided-treatment vs. the assay-guided treatment, and as 1,239,055 yen/QALY (10,774 US$/QALY) in the comparison between St Gallen guided-treatment vs. the assay-guided treatment. Budget impact is estimated as yen2,638 million (US$23 million) to yen3,225 million (US$28 million) per year. The routine use of the assay is indicated as cost-effective. And the budget impact could be judged as within fundable level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18075786     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-007-9842-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  16 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of the 21-Gene Assay in Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Wang; Weixiong Dang; Ilana Richman; Sarah S Mougalian; Suzanne B Evans; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Budget-impact analyses: a critical review of published studies.

Authors:  Ewa Orlewska; Laszlo Gulácsi
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Cost Effectiveness of Gene Expression Profile Testing in Community Practice.

Authors:  Young Chandler; Clyde B Schechter; Jinani Jayasekera; Aimee Near; Suzanne C O'Neill; Claudine Isaacs; Charles E Phelps; G Thomas Ray; Tracy A Lieu; Scott Ramsey; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of recurrence score-guided treatment using a 21-gene assay in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Daphne T Tsoi; Miho Inoue; Catherine M Kelly; Sunil Verma; Kathleen I Pritchard
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-04-26

Review 5.  Review of the clinical studies using the 21-gene assay.

Authors:  Catherine M Kelly; Ellen Warner; Daphne T Tsoi; Sunil Verma; Kathleen I Pritchard
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-04-26

6.  Cost effectiveness of a 21-gene recurrence score assay versus Canadian clinical practice in post-menopausal women with early-stage estrogen or progesterone-receptor-positive, axillary lymph-node positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Malek B Hannouf; Bin Xie; Muriel Brackstone; Gregory S Zaric
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Is individualized medicine more cost-effective? A systematic review.

Authors:  Maximilian H M Hatz; Katharina Schremser; Wolf H Rogowski
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Clinical utility of gene-expression profiling in women with early breast cancer: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Michael Marrone; Alison Stewart; W David Dotson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Gene Expression Profiling Tests for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2020-03-06

Review 10.  Multigene assays and molecular markers in breast cancer: systematic review of health economic analyses.

Authors:  Roman Rouzier; Paolo Pronzato; Elisabeth Chéreau; Josh Carlson; Barnaby Hunt; William J Valentine
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.