Literature DB >> 18072514

A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density.

Carri K Glide-Hurst1, Neb Duric, Peter Littrup.   

Abstract

Women with mammographic percent density >50% have a approximately three-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer, potentially making them screening candidates for breast MRI scanning. The purpose of this work is to introduce a new method to quantify mammographic percent density (MPD), and to compare the results with the current standard of care for breast density assessment. Craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) mammograms for 104 patients were digitized and analyzed using an interactive computer-assisted segmentation routine implemented for two purposes: (1) to segment the breast area from background and radiographic markers, and (2) to segment dense from fatty portions of the breast. Our technique was evaluated by comparing the results to qualitative estimates determined by a certified breast radiologist using the BI-RADS Categorical Assessment (1 (fatty) to 4 (dense) scale). Statistically significant correlations (two-tailed, p < 0.01) were observed between calculated MPD and BI-RADS for both CC (Spearman rho = 0.67) and MLO views (Spearman rho = 0.71). For the CC view, statistically significant differences were revealed between the mean MPD for each BI-RADS category except between fatty (BI-RADS 1) and scattered (BI-RADS 2). Finally, for the MLO views, statistically significant differences in the mean MPD between all BI-RADS categories were observed. Comparing the CC and MLO views revealed a strong positive correlation (Pearson r = 0.8) in calculated MPD. In addition, an evaluation of the reproducibility of our segmentation demonstrated the average standard deviation of MPD for a subsample of eight patients, measured five times, was 1.9% (range: 0.03%-9.9%). Eliminating one misassignment reduced the average standard deviation to 0.75% (range: 0.03%-3.16%). Further analysis of approximately 10% of the patient sample revealed strong agreement (ICC = 0.80-0.85) in the reliability of MPD estimates for both mammographic views. Overall, these results demonstrate the feasibility of utilizing our approach for quantitative breast density segmentation, which may be useful for detecting small changes in MPD introduced through chemoprevention, diet, or other interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18072514     DOI: 10.1118/1.2789407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  22 in total

Review 1.  Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Michael Bronskill; Martin J Yaffe; Neb Duric; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Three-dimensional microwave imaging of realistic numerical breast phantoms via a multiple-frequency inverse scattering technique.

Authors:  Jacob D Shea; Panagiotis Kosmas; Susan C Hagness; Barry D Van Veen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Prediction of near-term breast cancer risk based on bilateral mammographic feature asymmetry.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Bin Zheng; Pandiyarajan Ramalingam; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Reduction of false-positive recalls using a computerized mammographic image feature analysis scheme.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Jiantao Pu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Computerized prediction of risk for developing breast cancer based on bilateral mammographic breast tissue asymmetry.

Authors:  Xingwei Wang; Dror Lederman; Jun Tan; Xiao Hui Wang; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Automated mammographic breast density estimation using a fully convolutional network.

Authors:  Juhun Lee; Robert M Nishikawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Dedicated breast CT: fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Linxi Shi; Andrew Karellas; Avice M O'Connell
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Association between computed tissue density asymmetry in bilateral mammograms and near-term breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Maxine Tan; Pandiyarajan Ramalingam; David Gur
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.431

9.  Computerized detection of breast tissue asymmetry depicted on bilateral mammograms: a preliminary study of breast risk stratification.

Authors:  Xingwei Wang; Dror Lederman; Jun Tan; Xiao Hui Wang; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Development of a quantitative method for analysis of breast density based on three-dimensional breast MRI.

Authors:  Ke Nie; Jeon-Hor Chen; Siwa Chan; Man-Kwun I Chau; Hon J Yu; Shadfar Bahri; Tiffany Tseng; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.