Literature DB >> 18070800

Cervical muscle strength measurement is dependent on the location of thoracic support.

A Rezasoltani1, J Ylinen, A-H Bakhtiary, M Norozi, M Montazeri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In all studies in which the strength of the neck extensor muscles has been measured, the level of thoracic support has been adjusted differently so direct comparison of the results is not possible.
OBJECTIVE: To measure and compare the isometric force and isometric torque of neck extensor muscles at different levels of thoracic support.
METHODS: Twenty healthy women volunteered for the study. The maximum isometric force of the neck extensor muscles was measured with the thoracic support located at five different levels. The highest level was set at the level of the spine of the scapula (level I) and the other levels were located 2.5 cm lower than the previous one, with the lowest level set 10 cm below the highest level. The maximum isometric torque for each level was calculated by multiplying the isometric force by the length of the lever arm measured from the upper tip of the thoracic support to the centre point of the cell load at the occiput.
RESULTS: The maximum isometric force and maximum isometric torque of the neck extensor muscles were increased step by step from 130.5 N to 138.9 N, 141.9 N, 147.9 N and 155.4 N and from 33.7 Nm to 38.7 Nm, 42.5 Nm, 47.2 Nm and 52.7 Nm, respectively. Except for the isometric force of the cervical extensor muscles measured at levels II and III, the differences between the other levels were significant (p<0.05). There was a significant correlation between isometric force and isometric torque measurements of the neck extensor muscles at different levels (0.81<r<0.96).
CONCLUSION: Maximum isometric force and maximum isometric torque measurements of the neck extensor muscles vary with the length of the lever arm. It is recommended that a specific level of thoracic support should be used in follow-up and intervention studies. Setting the level of thoracic support at a specific level will make it possible to compare the strength of the neck extensor muscles in different studies. Measurements at the level of the spine of the scapula were easier and less time consuming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18070800     DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.040709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  6 in total

1.  Cervical range of motion and strength in 4,293 young male adults with chronic neck pain.

Authors:  Max Daniel Kauther; Michael Piotrowski; Bjoern Hussmann; Sven Lendemans; Christian Wedemeyer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Can a Specific Neck Strengthening Program Decrease Cervical Spine Injuries in a Men's Professional Rugby Union Team? A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Robert Naish; Angus Burnett; Sally Burrows; Warren Andrews; Brendyn Appleby
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Assessing Head/Neck Dynamic Response to Head Perturbation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Enora Le Flao; Matt Brughelli; Patria A Hume; Doug King
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Intraoperative forces and moments analysis on patient head clamp during awake brain surgery.

Authors:  Danilo De Lorenzo; Elena De Momi; Lorenzo Conti; Emiliano Votta; Marco Riva; Enrica Fava; Lorenzo Bello; Giancarlo Ferrigno
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Patient-specific numerical investigation of the correction of cervical kyphotic deformity based on a retrospective clinical case.

Authors:  Tianchi Wu; Hongyu Chen; Yu Sun; Tian Xia; Feifei Zhou; William W Lu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-09

6.  Test-retest repeatability of strength capacity, aerobic power and pericranial tenderness of neck and shoulder muscles in children - relevant for tension-type headache.

Authors:  Birte Tornøe; Lars L Andersen; Jørgen H Skotte; Rigmor Jensen; Gunvor Gard; Liselotte Skov; Inger Hallström
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.133

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.