Literature DB >> 18070729

Do novices display automaticity during simulator training?

Dimitrios Stefanidis1, Mark W Scerbo, Cathy Sechrist, Ana Mostafavi, B Todd Heniford.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate whether novices improve their ability to develop multitask (ie, automaticity) with accumulating experience on a simulated laparoscopic task.
METHODS: In this prospective study, novices (12 premed students) trained for 4 months in laparoscopic suturing. Simultaneously with suturing, participants performed a visual-spatial secondary task to assess their spare attentional capacity. Trainees were required to achieve expert-derived levels in both suturing (520 score) and the secondary task (target 73%). Their performance was assessed with objective scores, and their ability to multitask during training was examined.
RESULTS: After 10 +/- 5 hours and 84 +/- 41 repetitions, participants demonstrated improvements in their suturing (70%, P < 0.001) and secondary-task performance (16%, P = 0.08) compared with their baseline scores. During the study period, 11 of 12 participants achieved suturing proficiency, but no one achieved secondary-task proficiency. Longer training times correlated with higher secondary-task scores (r = .68, P < 0.02), and participants who performed >100 repetitions (n = 4) achieved higher secondary-task scores (P < 0.03). COMMENTS: This study provides evidence for improved automaticity at advanced stages of simulator training. Although novices achieve simulator proficiency after relatively short training durations, the attainment of automaticity requires substantially longer training periods. Further study of this concept is warranted and is currently underway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18070729     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  8 in total

1.  Can we become better robot surgeons through simulator practice?

Authors:  Ankit Patel; Meghna Patel; Nathaniel Lytle; Juan P Toro; Rachel L Medbery; Sheryl Bluestein; Sebastian D Perez; John F Sweeney; S Scott Davis; Edward Lin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Development of a fundamentals of endoscopic surgery proficiency-based skills curriculum for general surgery residents.

Authors:  Tomoko Mizota; Nicholas E Anton; Elizabeth M Huffman; Michael J Guzman; Frederick Lane; Jennifer N Choi; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Differences in mental workload between traditional and single-incision laparoscopic procedures measured with a secondary task.

Authors:  Mark W Scerbo; Rebecca C Britt; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Training with cognitive load improves performance under similar conditions in a real surgical task.

Authors:  Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Coleman A Odlozil; Katerina O Wells; Steven G Leeds; Sanket Chauhan; James W Fleshman; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Elective laparoscopic recto-sigmoid resection for diverticular disease is suitable as a training operation.

Authors:  Robbert Bosker; Froukje Hoogenboom; Henk Groen; Christiaan Hoff; Rutger Ploeg; Jean-Pierre Pierie
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Measurement of mental workload in clinical medicine: a review study.

Authors:  Aidan Byrne
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2011-09-26

7.  Towards immersive virtual reality (iVR): a route to surgical expertise.

Authors:  Saurabh Dargar; Rebecca Kennedy; WeiXuan Lai; Venkata Arikatla; Suvranu De
Journal:  J Comput Surg       Date:  2015-05-07

8.  Multitask training promotes automaticity of a fundamental laparoscopic skill without compromising the rate of skill learning.

Authors:  Jamie M Poolton; Frank F Zhu; Neha Malhotra; Gilberto K K Leung; Joe K M Fan; Rich S W Masters
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.