Literature DB >> 18070299

Left ventricular endocardial pacing: a transarterial approach.

Michael Reinig1, Melvin White, Marc Levine, Rido Cha, Ismail Cinel, Jasti Purnachandra, Roy Goldfarb, Zhongping Yang, Larry Mulligan, Joseph Parrillo, Lawrence Gessman.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We tested the feasibility of a new technique of direct left ventricular endocardial lead placement across the aortic valve in a chronic (six month) pig model. The potential for aortic valve damage, systemic embolization, and pacing lead maturation and function within the left ventricle are unknown.
METHODS: Ten minipigs were successfully implanted with a transaortic left ventricular lead (Medtronic CapSureFix, Minneapolis, MN, USA) placed in the left ventricular apex via the carotid artery. Each pig received either a polyurethane (n = 5) or silicone (n = 5) lead. Post implant each pig received clopidogrel and aspirin for seven days. After six months all surviving pigs underwent thorough necropsy.
RESULTS: Each pig had adequate sensing (12.1 +/- 4 mV) and pacing thresholds (0.79 +/- 0.2 @ 0.5 V) at implant. Postoperatively two pigs died of a respiratory illness. One pig died postoperatively due to sepsis. At the six-month follow-up, all surviving pigs (n = 7) were in a healthy state. Of the pigs without dislodgement (n = 5) there was adequate sensing, but a rise in pacing thresholds. Echocardiography revealed a normal ejection fraction and only trace to mild aortic insufficiency in all pigs. Of the seven surviving pigs there were no thromboembolic events noted. One silicone lead was noted to have thrombosis along the lead screw and shaft.
CONCLUSION: Direct transaortic placement of a left ventricular lead is feasible. After six months, there was no significant aortic regurgitation and no evidence of thromboembolism despite no anticoagulation. Lead function was acceptable and only one silicone lead (and no polyurethane lead) was noted to have significant thrombosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18070299     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00892.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

Review 1.  Lead positioning strategies to enhance response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Dan Blendea; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Left ventricular endocardial pacing in cardiac resynchronisation therapy: Moving from bench to bedside.

Authors:  F A Bracke; B M van Gelder; L R C Dekker; P Houthuizen; J F Ter Woorst; J A Teijink
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 3.  Endocardial pacing: the wave of the future?

Authors:  Pierre Bordachar; Sylvain Ploux; Joost Lumens
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Implanted endocardial lead characteristics and risk of stroke or transient ischemic attack.

Authors:  Vaibhav R Vaidya; Christopher V DeSimone; Samuel J Asirvatham; Vishnu M Chandra; Amit Noheria; David O Hodge; Joshua P Slusser; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Paul A Friedman
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Chronic lead malposition diagnosis and management: discussion of two cases and literature review.

Authors:  Ahmed Almomani; Amjad Abualsuod; Hakan Paydak; Wilburt Peer; Waddah Maskoun
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2017-02-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.