Literature DB >> 18070233

In patients with slow transit constipation, the pattern of colonic transit delay does not differentiate between those with and without impaired rectal evacuation.

Natalie Zarate1, Charlie H Knowles, Margaret Newell, Neil W Garvie, Marc A Gladman, Peter J Lunniss, S Mark Scott.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Severe constipation may be subclassified on the basis of speed of colonic transit and efficacy of rectal evacuation. It is hypothesized that rectal evacuatory disorder (RED) may be associated with a secondary transit delay.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether scintigraphy can discriminate between slow transit constipation (STC) with or without coexistent RED on the basis of progression of isotope throughout the colon and by analyses of specific regions of interest.
METHODS: One hundred ninety-six patients with STC (radio-opaque marker study) were subclassified according to results of proctography into those with a RED (STC-RED N = 30) or normal (STC-ONLY N = 41) evacuation. Patients subsequently underwent colonic scintigraphy. Distribution of generalized or left-sided patterns of colonic transit was assessed. Severities of transit delay and regional transit at specific time points were also evaluated.
RESULTS: Time-activity curves and severity of global transit delay were similar between groups as were the incidences of generalized and left-sided patterns of delay. Percentage of radioisotope retention in the right colon at 18 h was higher for the STC-ONLY group (P < 0.05), but this was poorly discriminative. No differences were observed for the percentage of radioisotope retained in the left colon at later scans.
CONCLUSIONS: Global and regional assessment of colonic transit by scintigraphy failed to discriminate between patients with STC with or without coexistent RED. Thus, RED is not associated with a specific pattern of transit delay and scintigraphy alone cannot predict the presence or absence of RED, knowledge of which is important for management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18070233     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01675.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  13 in total

1.  Wireless capsule motility: comparison of the SmartPill GI monitoring system with scintigraphy for measuring whole gut transit.

Authors:  Sabba Maqbool; Henry P Parkman; Frank K Friedenberg
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  American Gastroenterological Association technical review on constipation.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; John H Pemberton; G Richard Locke
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Treatment efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation in slow transit constipation: a two-phase, double-blind randomized controlled crossover study.

Authors:  Phil G Dinning; Linda Hunt; Vicki Patton; Teng Zhang; Michal Szczesniak; Val Gebski; Mike Jones; Peter Stewart; David Z Lubowski; Ian J Cook
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Consensus statement AIGO/SICCR: diagnosis and treatment of chronic constipation and obstructed defecation (part I: diagnosis).

Authors:  Antonio Bove; Filippo Pucciani; Massimo Bellini; Edda Battaglia; Renato Bocchini; Donato Francesco Altomare; Giuseppe Dodi; Guido Sciaudone; Ezio Falletto; Vittorio Piloni; Dario Gambaccini; Vincenzo Bove
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Factor analysis identifies subgroups of constipation.

Authors:  Philip G Dinning; Mike Jones; Linda Hunt; Sergio E Fuentealba; Jamshid Kalanter; Denis W King; David Z Lubowski; Nicholas J Talley; Ian J Cook
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Clinical utility of colonic manometry in slow transit constipation.

Authors:  S Singh; S Heady; E Coss-Adame; S S C Rao
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 7.  Pathophysiology of colonic causes of chronic constipation.

Authors:  P G Dinning; T K Smith; S M Scott
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Clinical presentation and patterns of slow transit constipation do not predict coexistent upper gut dysmotility.

Authors:  Natalia Zarate; Charlie H Knowles; Etsuro Yazaki; Peter J Lunnis; S Mark Scott
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  Colonic transit studies: normal values for adults and children with comparison of radiological and scintigraphic methods.

Authors:  Bridget R Southwell; Melanie C C Clarke; Jonathan Sutcliffe; John M Hutson
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 1.827

10.  Colonic total and segmental transit times in healthy Italian adults.

Authors:  F Pomerri; G Dodi; M Nardin; P C Muzzio
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.