Literature DB >> 18070224

Age-dependent normative values for differential luminance sensitivity in automated static perimetry using the Octopus 101.

Agnes Hermann1, Jens Paetzold, Reinhard Vonthein, Elke Krapp, Stephan Rauscher, Ulrich Schiefer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine age-dependent normative differential threshold values for the Octopus 101 instrument and to create a smooth mathematical model characterizing the age-dependency and asymmetry of the hill of vision.
METHODS: Static automated perimetry within the central 30 degrees visual field (VF) was conducted with the Octopus 101 (background luminance 10 cd/m(2)) in 81 eyes of 81 ophthalmologically healthy subjects (11-12 per decade of age) aged 10-79 years. A 4-2-2 staircase strategy with three reversals was run. The test point grid consisted of 68 concentrically arranged points with test point condensation towards the VF centre, representing the approximately rotation-symmetrical 30 degrees hill of vision. Thresholds of differential luminance sensitivity (DLS) were estimated by the maximum likelihood method. A smooth mathematical model was fitted to the normative data.
RESULTS: The model fit was satisfactory (r(2) = 0.74). Covariables were: age, eccentricity, angle and subject. Total random standard deviation (SD) was 1.75 dB. The residual SD exceeded 1.75 dB in the border region, was 1.5 dB within the centre and fell below 1.25 dB in a ring around the centre. Average thresholds of DLS varied with age quadratically. It is close to constant for the 10-40-year-old age group and declines ever more steeply thereafter. The effect of age on DLS in the VF increased with eccentricity. The greatest drop was located in the peripheral superior hemifield: at 25 degrees eccentricity the superior DLS was estimated to be 5.5 dB higher in 10-year-olds than in 75-year-olds.
CONCLUSIONS: This new smooth model allows for the prediction of age-related normal threshold values for any stimulus location within the 30 degrees VF and thus for the calculation of global and local measures of defect such as mean defects or p-values for any type of stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18070224     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01055.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


  13 in total

1.  Optical coherence tomography shows progressive local nerve fiber loss after disc hemorrhages in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Christoph Kernstock; Janko Dietzsch; Kai Januschowski; Ulrich Schiefer; M Dominik Fischer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Comparing the Nidek MP-1 and Humphrey field analyzer in normal subjects.

Authors:  Jennifer H Acton; Nicholas S Bartlett; Vivienne C Greenstein
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Development of a Spatial Model of Age-Related Change in the Macular Ganglion Cell Layer to Predict Function From Structural Changes.

Authors:  Janelle Tong; Jack Phu; Sieu K Khuu; Nayuta Yoshioka; Agnes Y Choi; Lisa Nivison-Smith; Robert E Marc; Bryan W Jones; Rebecca L Pfeiffer; Michael Kalloniatis; Barbara Zangerl
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Comparison of the new perimetric GATE strategy with conventional full-threshold and SITA standard strategies.

Authors:  Ulrich Schiefer; John P Pascual; Beth Edmunds; Elisabeth Feudner; Esther M Hoffmann; Chris A Johnson; Wolf A Lagrèze; Norbert Pfeiffer; Pamela A Sample; Flemming Staubach; Richard G Weleber; Reinhard Vonthein; Elke Krapp; Jens Paetzold
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Volume of visual field assessed with kinetic perimetry and its application to static perimetry.

Authors:  John B Christoforidis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-26

6.  Regional Variations and Intra-/Intersession Repeatability for Scotopic Sensitivity in Normal Controls and Patients With Inherited Retinal Degenerations.

Authors:  Lea D Bennett; Georgiana Metz; Martin Klein; Kirsten G Locke; Areeba Khwaja; David G Birch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Specification of progression in glaucomatous visual field loss, applying locally condensed stimulus arrangements.

Authors:  Jukka Nevalainen; Jens Paetzold; Eleni Papageorgiou; Pamela A Sample; John P Pascual; Elke Krapp; Bettina Selig; Reinhard Vonthein; Ulrich Schiefer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Retinal Differential Light Sensitivity Variation Across the Macula in Healthy Subjects: Importance of Cone Separation and Loci Eccentricity.

Authors:  Danuta M Sampson; Danial Roshandel; Avenell L Chew; Yufei Wang; Paul G Stevenson; Matthew N Cooper; Elaine Ong; Lawrence Wong; Jonathan La; David Alonso-Caneiro; Enid Chelva; Jane C Khan; David D Sampson; Fred K Chen
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Incorporating Spatial Models in Visual Field Test Procedures.

Authors:  Nikki J Rubinstein; Allison M McKendrick; Andrew Turpin
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Pattern Recognition Analysis Reveals Unique Contrast Sensitivity Isocontours Using Static Perimetry Thresholds Across the Visual Field.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Sieu K Khuu; Lisa Nivison-Smith; Barbara Zangerl; Agnes Yiu Jeung Choi; Bryan W Jones; Rebecca L Pfeiffer; Robert E Marc; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.