Literature DB >> 18069745

Investigating trial and treatment heterogeneity in an individual patient data meta-analysis of survival data by means of the penalized maximum likelihood approach.

V Rondeau1, S Michiels, B Liquet, J P Pignon.   

Abstract

In a meta-analysis combining survival data from different clinical trials, an important issue is the possible heterogeneity between trials. Such intertrial variation can not only be explained by heterogeneity of treatment effects across trials but also by heterogeneity of their baseline risk. In addition, one might examine the relationship between magnitude of the treatment effect and the underlying risk of the patients in the different trials. Such a scenario can be accounted for by using additive random effects in the Cox model, with a random trial effect and a random treatment-by-trial interaction. We propose to use this kind of model with a general correlation structure for the random effects and to estimate parameters and hazard function using a semi-parametric penalized marginal likelihood method (maximum penalized likelihood estimators). This approach gives smoothed estimates of the hazard function, which represents incidence in epidemiology. The idea for the approach in this paper comes from the study of heterogeneity in a large meta-analysis of randomized trials in patients with head and neck cancers (meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancers) and the effect of adding chemotherapy to locoregional treatment. The simulation study and the application demonstrate that the proposed approach yields satisfactory results and they illustrate the need to use a flexible variance-covariance structure for the random effects. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18069745     DOI: 10.1002/sim.3161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  15 in total

1.  Frailty modelling for survival data from multi-centre clinical trials.

Authors:  Il Do Ha; Richard Sylvester; Catherine Legrand; Gilbert Mackenzie
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Analysis of clustered competing risks data using subdistribution hazard models with multivariate frailties.

Authors:  Il Do Ha; Nicholas J Christian; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Junwoo Park; Youngjo Lee
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Variable selection in subdistribution hazard frailty models with competing risks data.

Authors:  Il Do Ha; Minjung Lee; Seungyoung Oh; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Richard Sylvester; Youngjo Lee
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniele Giacoppo; Roisin Colleran; Salvatore Cassese; Antonio H Frangieh; Jens Wiebe; Michael Joner; Heribert Schunkert; Adnan Kastrati; Robert A Byrne
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 14.676

5.  Interval estimation of random effects in proportional hazards models with frailties.

Authors:  Il Do Ha; Florin Vaida; Youngjo Lee
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Individual patient data meta-analysis of survival data using Poisson regression models.

Authors:  Michael J Crowther; Richard D Riley; Jan A Staessen; Jiguang Wang; Francois Gueyffier; Paul C Lambert
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Primary squamous cell carcinomas in the thyroid gland: an individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jae Keun Cho; Seung-Hoon Woo; Junoh Park; Min-Ji Kim; Han-Sin Jeong
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 8.  Short term versus long term dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug eluting stent in patients with or without diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gargiulo; Stephan Windecker; Bruno R da Costa; Fausto Feres; Myeong-Ki Hong; Martine Gilard; Hyo-Soo Kim; Antonio Colombo; Deepak L Bhatt; Byeong-Keuk Kim; Marie-Claude Morice; Kyung Woo Park; Alaide Chieffo; Tullio Palmerini; Gregg W Stone; Marco Valgimigli
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-11-03

9.  Bias and precision of methods for estimating the difference in restricted mean survival time from an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Béranger Lueza; Federico Rotolo; Julia Bonastre; Jean-Pierre Pignon; Stefan Michiels
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 10.  Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis: a review of the methodology.

Authors:  Thomas P A Debray; Karel G M Moons; Gert van Valkenhoef; Orestis Efthimiou; Noemi Hummel; Rolf H H Groenwold; Johannes B Reitsma
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.273

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.