Literature DB >> 18069363

Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.

Markus Balkenhol1, Paul Ferger, Bernd Wöstmann.   

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of the impression tray and viscosity of the wash material on the dimensional accuracy of impressions taken using a 2-stage putty-wash technique. Identically shaped metal stock trays (MeTs) and disposable plastic stock trays (DiTs) were used for taking impressions (n = 10) of a mandibular cast (4 abutments) with 2 different impression materials. Dies were poured and the relative diameter deviation was calculated after measurement. Zero viscosity of the materials was determined. Dimensional accuracy was significantly affected when DiTs were used. Lower-viscosity wash materials led to more precise impressions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18069363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  8 in total

1.  Influence of material surface on the scanning error of a powder-free 3D measuring system.

Authors:  Michael Kurz; Thomas Attin; Albert Mehl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  In vivo Study of the Accuracy of Dual-arch Impressions.

Authors:  Luciana Martinelli Santayana de Lima; Gilberto Antonio Borges; Luiz Henrique Burnett Junior; Ana Maria Spohr
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-06-26

3.  Randomized controlled clinical trial on the three-dimensional accuracy of fast-set impression materials.

Authors:  Heike Rudolph; Sebastian Quaas; Manuela Haim; Jörg Preißler; Michael H Walter; Rainer Koch; Ralph G Luthardt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Danush Ahrberg; Hans Christoph Lauer; Martin Ahrberg; Paul Weigl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  [Effect of disinfectant with benzethon chloramine and isopropanol as main active ingredients on the accuracy of dental impression].

Authors:  D Xu; D H Wei; Y C Zhang; P DI; Y Lin
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-12-18

6.  Comparative Evaluation of Surface Detail Reproduction and Dimensional Stability of Poly Ether, Vinyl Siloxane, and Vinyl Siloxane Ether Impression Materials: An In vitro Study.

Authors:  Shyma Rose; Shyammohan Aravindakshan; Jafar Abdulla Mohamed Usman; Raza Mohamed; Sheethel Menon; Rahmath Shameem Shafiullah; Mahmoud Gamal Salloum
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-06-05

7.  Comparing the Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials in Making Duplicate Dies.

Authors:  Farshad Bajoghli; Mahmoud Sabouhi; Saeid Nosouhian; Amin Davoudi; Zeynab Behnamnia
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-07

8.  Impression material accuracy for palatal orthodontic miniscrews.

Authors:  Natalie Schenz; Vincent Schwarz; Romed Hörmann; Adriano G Crismani
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 1.938

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.