Literature DB >> 18068951

Interaction of clothing and body mass index affects validity of air-displacement plethysmography in adults.

Kimberly J Shafer1, William A Siders, LuAnn K Johnson, Henry C Lukaski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We determined the effect of clothing type on the validity of air-displacement plethysmography (ADP) to estimate percentage of body fat (%BF) and ascertain if these effects differ by body mass index (BMI).
METHODS: The %BF by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and %BF, density, and body volume by ADP were assessed in 132 healthy adults classified by normal (N; 18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (OW; 25-29.9 kg/m2), and obese (OB; 30-39.9 kg/m2) BMIs.
RESULTS: Compared with DXA, ADP underestimated (P < 0.0001) %BF from scrubs (SC) and t-shirt/shorts (TS) in N (11.4%; 8.6%) and OW (6.8%; 4.9%) BMI groups, respectively. ADP compared with DXA overestimated (P < 0.0006) %BF in the OW group (1.2%), but underestimated (P < 0.0001) it in the N group (2.4%). ADP also overestimated (P < 0.006) %BF in the OB group wearing spandex (SP; 4.8%), but not in those wearing SC (0.7%; P = 0.10) and TS (0.5%; P = 0.22) versus DXA.
CONCLUSION: All three clothing types showed significant error in estimating %BF with ADP compared with DXA in N and OW BMI. Use of spandex provided the least error and is the preferred attire to obtain valid body composition results when testing N and OW subjects. However, SP provided the greatest error in the OB group. Error in ADP %BF in OB was minimal in SC and TS and similar to the within-subject variability in %BF estimates with ADP. Thus, TS and SC are acceptable alternatives to SP in adults with excess body weight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18068951     DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2007.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutrition        ISSN: 0899-9007            Impact factor:   4.008


  5 in total

1.  Validity of weight loss to estimate improvement in body composition in individuals attending a wellness center.

Authors:  Paulina Cruz; Bruce D Johnson; Susan C Karpinski; Katherine A Limoges; Beth A Warren; Kerry D Olsen; Virend K Somers; Michael D Jensen; Matthew M Clark; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 5.002

2.  Evaluation of a rotary laser body scanner for body volume and fat assessment.

Authors:  M Reese Pepper; Jeanne H Freeland-Graves; Wurong Yu; Philip R Stanforth; Bugao Xu
Journal:  J Test Eval       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 1.264

3.  Subject positioning in the BOD POD® only marginally affects measurement of body volume and estimation of percent body fat in young adult men.

Authors:  Maarten W Peeters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Validation of simple epidemiological or clinical methods for the measurement of body composition in young children.

Authors:  Diane M Jackson; Zoe Donaghy; Kurosh Djafarian; John J Reilly
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 0.364

5.  The impact of subject positioning on body composition assessments by air displacement plethysmography evaluated in a heterogeneous sample.

Authors:  Raluca Horhat; Monica Miclos-Balica; Paul Muntean; Sandra Popa; Irina Sima; Bogdan Glisici; Onisim Cîrja; Adrian Neagu; Monica Neagu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.