Literature DB >> 18067390

In vitro evaluation of flow divertors in an elastase-induced saccular aneurysm model in rabbit.

Jaehoon Seong1, Ajay K Wakhloo, Baruch B Lieber.   

Abstract

Endovascular coiling is an acceptable treatment of intracranial aneurysms, yet long term follow-ups suggest that endovascular coiling fails to achieve complete aneurysm occlusions particularly in wide-neck and giant aneurysms. Placing of a stentlike device across the aneurysm neck may be sufficient to occlude the aneurysm by promoting intra-aneurysmal thrombosis; however, conclusive evidence of its efficacy is still lacking. In this study, we investigate in vitro the efficacy of custom designed flow divertors that will be subsequently implanted in a large cohort of animals. The aim of this study is to provide a detailed database against which in vivo results can be analyzed. Six custom designed flow divertors were fabricated and tested in vitro. The design matrix included three different porosities (75%, 70%, and 65%). For each porosity, there were two divertors with one having a nominal pore density double than that of the other. To quantify efficacy, the divertors were implanted in a compliant elastomeric model of an elastase-induced aneurysm model in rabbit and intra-aneurysmal flow changes were evaluated by particle image velocimetry (PIV). PIV results indicate a marked reduction in intra-aneurysmal flow activity after divertor implantation in the innominate artery across the aneurysm neck. The mean hydrodynamic circulation after divertor implantation was reduced to 14% or less of the mean circulation in the control and the mean intra-aneurysmal kinetic energy was reduced to 29% or less of its value in the control. The intra-aneurysmal wall shear rate in this model is low and implantation of the flow divertor did not change the wall shear rate magnitude appreciably. This in vitro experiment evaluates the characteristics of local flow phenomena such as hydrodynamic circulation, kinetic energy, wall shear rate, perforator flow, and changes of these parameters as a result of implantation of stentlike flow divertors in an elastomeric replica of elastase-induced saccular aneurysm model in rabbit. These initial findings offer a database for evaluation of in vivo implantations of such devices in the animal model and help in further development of cerebral aneurysm bypass devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18067390     DOI: 10.1115/1.2800787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  29 in total

Review 1.  Endoluminal scaffolds for vascular reconstruction and exclusion of aneurysms from the cerebral circulation.

Authors:  Baruch B Lieber; Chander Sadasivan
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Two-stage reconstructive overlapping stent LEO+ and SILK for treatment of intracranial circumferential fusiform aneurysms in the posterior circulation.

Authors:  Guilherme Cabral de Andrade; Helvercio P Alves; Valter Clímaco; Eduardo Pereira; Alexandre Lesczynsky; Michel E Frudit
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Perianeurysmal brain inflammation after flow-diversion treatment.

Authors:  J Berge; T Tourdias; J-F Moreau; X Barreau; V Dousset
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Surpass flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  A K Wakhloo; P Lylyk; J de Vries; C Taschner; J Lundquist; A Biondi; M Hartmann; I Szikora; L Pierot; N Sakai; H Imamura; N Sourour; I Rennie; M Skalej; O Beuing; A Bonafé; F Mery; F Turjman; P Brouwer; E Boccardi; L Valvassori; S Derakhshani; M W Litzenberg; M J Gounis
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Sensitivity of CFD based hemodynamic results in rabbit aneurysm models to idealizations in surrounding vasculature.

Authors:  Zijing Zeng; David F Kallmes; Michael J Durka; Yonghong Ding; Debra Lewis; Ramanathan Kadirvel; Anne M Robertson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  In vitro angiographic comparison of the flow-diversion performance of five neurovascular stents.

Authors:  Ronak J Dholakia; Ari D Kappel; Andrew Pagano; Henry H Woo; Baruch B Lieber; David J Fiorella; Chander Sadasivan
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.610

7.  Hemodynamic analysis of fast and slow aneurysm occlusions by flow diversion in rabbits.

Authors:  Bongjae Chung; Fernando Mut; Ramanathan Kadirvel; Ravi Lingineni; David F Kallmes; Juan R Cebral
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 5.836

8.  Patency of the anterior choroidal artery after flow-diversion treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms.

Authors:  W Brinjikji; D F Kallmes; H J Cloft; G Lanzino
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Comparison of the in vitro hemodynamic performance of new flow diverters for bypass of brain aneurysms.

Authors:  Asher L Trager; Chander Sadasivan; Baruch B Lieber
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.097

10.  Stents and flow diverters in the treatment of aneurysms: device deformation in vivo may alter porosity and impact efficacy.

Authors:  Fabrice Bing; Tim E Darsaut; Igor Salazkin; Alina Makoyeva; Guylaine Gevry; Jean Raymond
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.