Literature DB >> 18067388

Mechanical stimulation of tendon tissue engineered constructs: effects on construct stiffness, repair biomechanics, and their correlation.

Jason T Shearn1, Natalia Juncosa-Melvin, Gregory P Boivin, Marc T Galloway, Wendy Goodwin, Cynthia Gooch, Michael G Dunn, David L Butler.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine how in vitro mechanical stimulation of tissue engineered constructs affects their stiffness and modulus in culture and tendon repair biomechanics 12 weeks after surgical implantation. Using six female adult New Zealand White rabbits, autogenous tissue engineered constructs were created by seeding mesenchymal stem cells (0.1 x 10(6) cells/ml) in collagen gel (2.6 mg/ml) and combining both with a collagen sponge. Employing a novel experimental design strategy, four constructs from each animal were mechanically stimulated (one 1 Hz cycle every 5 min to 2.4% peak strain for 8 h/day for 2 weeks) while the other four remained unstretched during the 2 week culture period. At the end of incubation, three of the mechanically stimulated (S) and three of the nonstimulated (NS) constructs from each animal were assigned for in vitro mechanical testing while the other two autogenous constructs were implanted into bilateral full-thickness, full-length defects created in the central third of rabbit patellar tendons (PTs). No significant differences were found in the in vitro linear stiffnesses between the S (0.15+/-0.1 N/mm) and NS constructs (0.08+/-0.02 N/mm; mean+/-SD). However, in vitro mechanical stimulation significantly increased the structural and material properties of the repair tissue, including a 14% increase in maximum force (p=0.01), a 50% increase in linear stiffness (p=0.001), and 23-41% increases in maximum stress and modulus (p=0.01). The S repairs achieved 65%, 80%, 60%, and 40% of normal central PT maximum force, linear stiffness, maximum stress, and linear modulus, respectively. The results for the S constructs exceed values obtained previously by our group using the same animal and defect model, and to our knowledge, this is the first study to show the benefits of in vitro mechanical stimulation on tendon repair biomechanics. In addition, the linear stiffnesses for the construct and repair were positively correlated (r=0.56) as were their linear moduli (r=0.68). Such in vitro predictors of in vivo outcome hold the potential to speed the development of tissue engineered products by reducing the time and costs of in vivo studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18067388     DOI: 10.1115/1.2800769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  24 in total

1.  Effect of implanting a soft tissue autograft in a central-third patellar tendon defect: biomechanical and histological comparisons.

Authors:  Kirsten R C Kinneberg; Marc T Galloway; David L Butler; Jason T Shearn
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  The use of mesenchymal stem cells in collagen-based scaffolds for tissue-engineered repair of tendons.

Authors:  David L Butler; Cynthia Gooch; Kirsten R C Kinneberg; Gregory P Boivin; Marc T Galloway; V Sanjit Nirmalanandhan; Jason T Shearn; Nathaniel A Dyment; Natalia Juncosa-Melvin
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  Finite element modeling of 3D human mesenchymal stem cell-seeded collagen matrices exposed to tensile strain.

Authors:  T Wayne Pfeiler; Ruwan D Sumanasinghe; Elizabeth G Loboa
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Using functional tissue engineering and bioreactors to mechanically stimulate tissue-engineered constructs.

Authors:  David L Butler; Shawn A Hunter; Kumar Chokalingam; Michael J Cordray; Jason Shearn; Natalia Juncosa-Melvin; Sanjit Nirmalanandhan; Abhishek Jain
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 5.  The role of mechanical loading in tendon development, maintenance, injury, and repair.

Authors:  Marc T Galloway; Andrea L Lalley; Jason T Shearn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The development of collagen-GAG scaffold-membrane composites for tendon tissue engineering.

Authors:  Steven R Caliari; Manuel A Ramirez; Brendan A C Harley
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Biomechanical evaluation of a novel suturing scheme for grafting load-bearing collagen scaffolds for rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Anowarul Islam; Michael S Bohl; Andrew G Tsai; Mousa Younesi; Robert Gillespie; Ozan Akkus
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 8.  Tendon tissue engineering: progress, challenges, and translation to the clinic.

Authors:  J T Shearn; K R Kinneberg; N A Dyment; M T Galloway; K Kenter; C Wylie; D L Butler
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.041

9.  Three-dimensional in vitro effects of compression and time in culture on aggregate modulus and on gene expression and protein content of collagen type II in murine chondrocytes.

Authors:  Kumar Chokalingam; Shawn Hunter; Cynthia Gooch; Chris Frede; Jane Florer; Richard Wenstrup; David Butler
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Collagen scaffold supplementation does not improve the functional properties of the repaired anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Braden C Fleming; Elise M Magarian; Sophia L Harrison; David J Paller; Martha M Murray
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.