Anowarul Islam1, Michael S Bohl2, Andrew G Tsai3, Mousa Younesi1, Robert Gillespie3, Ozan Akkus4. 1. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. 2. The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA. 3. Department of Orthopaedics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. 4. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; Department of Orthopaedics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. Electronic address: oxa@case.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no well-established suture protocols to attach fully load-bearing scaffolds which span tendon defects between bone and muscle for repair of critical sized tendon tears. Methods to attach load-bearing tissue repair scaffolds could enable functional repair of tendon injuries. METHODS: Sixteen rabbit shoulders were dissected (New Zealand white rabbits, 1yr. old, female) to isolate the humeral-infraspinatus muscle complex. A unique suture technique was developed to allow for a 5mm segmental defect in infraspinatus tendon to be replaced with a mechanically strong bioscaffold woven from pure collagen threads. The suturing pattern resulted in a fully load-bearing scaffold. The tensile stiffness and strength of scaffold repair were compared with intact infraspinatus and regular direct repair. FINDINGS: The failure load and displacement at failure of the scaffold repair group were 59.9N (standard deviation, SD=10.7) and 10.3mm (SD=2.9), respectively and matched those obtained by direct repair group which were 57.5N (SD=15.3) and 8.6mm (SD=1.5), (p>0.05). Failure load, displacement at failure and stiffness of both of the repair groups were half of the intact infraspinatus shoulder group. INTERPRETATION: With the developed suture technique, scaffold repair showed similar failure load, displacement at failure and stiffness to the direct repair. This novel suturing pattern and the mechanical robustness of the scaffold at time zero indicates that the proposed model is mechanically viable for future in vivo studies which has a higher potential to translate into clinical uses.
BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no well-established suture protocols to attach fully load-bearing scaffolds which span tendon defects between bone and muscle for repair of critical sized tendon tears. Methods to attach load-bearing tissue repair scaffolds could enable functional repair of tendon injuries. METHODS: Sixteen rabbit shoulders were dissected (New Zealand white rabbits, 1yr. old, female) to isolate the humeral-infraspinatus muscle complex. A unique suture technique was developed to allow for a 5mm segmental defect in infraspinatus tendon to be replaced with a mechanically strong bioscaffold woven from pure collagen threads. The suturing pattern resulted in a fully load-bearing scaffold. The tensile stiffness and strength of scaffold repair were compared with intact infraspinatus and regular direct repair. FINDINGS: The failure load and displacement at failure of the scaffold repair group were 59.9N (standard deviation, SD=10.7) and 10.3mm (SD=2.9), respectively and matched those obtained by direct repair group which were 57.5N (SD=15.3) and 8.6mm (SD=1.5), (p>0.05). Failure load, displacement at failure and stiffness of both of the repair groups were half of the intact infraspinatus shoulder group. INTERPRETATION: With the developed suture technique, scaffold repair showed similar failure load, displacement at failure and stiffness to the direct repair. This novel suturing pattern and the mechanical robustness of the scaffold at time zero indicates that the proposed model is mechanically viable for future in vivo studies which has a higher potential to translate into clinical uses.
Authors: Gregory H Altman; Rebecca L Horan; Ivan Martin; Jian Farhadi; Peter R H Stark; Vladimir Volloch; John C Richmond; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic; David L Kaplan Journal: FASEB J Date: 2001-12-28 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Vipuil Kishore; John E Paderi; Anna Akkus; Katie M Smith; Dave Balachandran; Stephen Beaudoin; Alyssa Panitch; Ozan Akkus Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2011-02-26 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Natalia Juncosa-Melvin; Jason T Shearn; Gregory P Boivin; Cynthia Gooch; Marc T Galloway; John R West; Victor S Nirmalanandhan; Gino Bradica; David L Butler Journal: Tissue Eng Date: 2006-08
Authors: Andrew R Baker; Jesse A McCarron; Carmela D Tan; Joseph P Iannotti; Kathleen A Derwin Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Benjamin B Rothrauff; Thierry Pauyo; Richard E Debski; Mark W Rodosky; Rocky S Tuan; Volker Musahl Journal: Tissue Eng Part B Rev Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 6.389