Literature DB >> 18066426

Artifact and head movement compensation in MEG.

M Medvedovsky1, S Taulu, R Bikmullina, R Paetau.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is traditionally considered impractical if the subject's head moves during measurements. A novel approach to correct the head position and the associated movement-related artifacts does, however, exist: continuous head position monitoring and movement compensation (MC) realized by the signal space separation (SSS) or its temporal extension (tSSS). The latter is especially important for rejection of close-to-sensor artifacts. The goal of the present work was to study how MC-SSS and its temporal extension MC-tSSS would influence MEG results.
METHODS: Somatosensory evoked MEG responses to electrical median nerve stimulation were recorded with 204 planar gradiometers and 102 magnetometers. We compared the localization error of the N20m source, the averaged baseline noise, goodness of fit and confidence volume on data processed by MC-SSS vs. MC-tSSS on a subject moving in a controlled manner.
RESULTS: We defined two patterns of disturbances with MC-SSS: stimulus artifact increase and random noise increase mainly on the lowermost sensors in very low head positions (5-6 cm shift). Up to 5-cm head shift, MC-SSS decreased mean localization error from 3.91 to 2.13 cm, but at the same time increased noise on gradiometers from 3.4 to 5.3 fT/cm. The noise increment occurred simultaneously with signal enhancement as MC transformed the head position closer to the sensors. Replacement of SSS by tSSS reduced the noise on gradiometers from 5.3 to 2.8 fT/cm and on magnetometers from 1.4 to 0.8 fT, reduced the mean localization error from 2.13 to 0.89 cm and increased the goodness of fit from 61.5% to 76.5%. Thus, tSSS specifically suppressed the random noise and nearby artifacts without suppressing the signal and thereby improved the signal to noise ratio.
CONCLUSIONS: Head position recalculation should be combined with a powerful artifact rejection method. We recommend limiting MC use up to 3 cm head shift and using tSSS-based MC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18066426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Neurophysiol Neurosci        ISSN: 1933-1266


  23 in total

1.  Denoising based on spatial filtering.

Authors:  Alain de Cheveigné; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Source localization of the seizure onset zone from ictal EEG/MEG data.

Authors:  Giovanni Pellegrino; Tanguy Hedrich; Rasheda Chowdhury; Jeffery A Hall; Jean-Marc Lina; Francois Dubeau; Eliane Kobayashi; Christophe Grova
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Different cortical involvement pattern of generalized and localized spasms: a magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Yosuke Kakisaka; Ajay Gupta; Zhong I Wang; Anne-Sophie Dubarry; Andreas V Alexopoulos; John C Mosher; Richard C Burgess
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.937

4.  Clinical evidence for the utility of movement compensation algorithm in magnetoencephalography: successful localization during focal seizure.

Authors:  Yosuke Kakisaka; Zhong I Wang; John C Mosher; Anne-Sophie Dubarry; Andreas V Alexopoulos; Rei Enatsu; Prakash Kotagal; Richard C Burgess
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 3.045

5.  Magnetoencephalography reveals a unique neurophysiological profile of focal-onset epileptic spasms.

Authors:  Yosuke Kakisaka; Ajay Gupta; Rei Enatsu; Zhong I Wang; Andreas V Alexopoulos; John C Mosher; Anne-Sophie Dubarry; Naomi Hino-Fukuyo; Richard C Burgess
Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Infant brain responses to felt and observed touch of hands and feet: an MEG study.

Authors:  Andrew N Meltzoff; Rey R Ramírez; Joni N Saby; Eric Larson; Samu Taulu; Peter J Marshall
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2018-01-14

7.  Lamina-specific cortical dynamics in human visual and sensorimotor cortices.

Authors:  Gareth R Barnes; Sven Bestmann; James J Bonaiuto; Sofie S Meyer; Simon Little; Holly Rossiter; Martina F Callaghan; Frederic Dick
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Practical real-time MEG-based neural interfacing with optically pumped magnetometers.

Authors:  Marc M Van Hulle; Richard Bowtell; Matthew J Brookes; Benjamin Wittevrongel; Niall Holmes; Elena Boto; Ryan Hill; Molly Rea; Arno Libert; Elvira Khachatryan
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 7.431

9.  Infant brain imaging using magnetoencephalography: Challenges, solutions, and best practices.

Authors:  Maggie D Clarke; Alexis N Bosseler; Julia C Mizrahi; Erica R Peterson; Eric Larson; Andrew N Meltzoff; Patricia K Kuhl; Samu Taulu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 5.399

10.  Optimized beamforming for simultaneous MEG and intracranial local field potential recordings in deep brain stimulation patients.

Authors:  Vladimir Litvak; Alexandre Eusebio; Ashwani Jha; Robert Oostenveld; Gareth R Barnes; William D Penny; Ludvic Zrinzo; Marwan I Hariz; Patricia Limousin; Karl J Friston; Peter Brown
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.