Literature DB >> 18066371

A framework for designing a healthcare outcome data warehouse.

Bambang Parmanto1, Matthew Scotch, Sjarif Ahmad.   

Abstract

Many healthcare processes involve a series of patient visits or a series of outcomes. The modeling of outcomes associated with these types of healthcare processes is different from and not as well understood as the modeling of standard industry environments. For this reason, the typical multidimensional data warehouse designs that are frequently seen in other industries are often not a good match for data obtained from healthcare processes. Dimensional modeling is a data warehouse design technique that uses a data structure similar to the easily understood entity-relationship (ER) model but is sophisticated in that it supports high-performance data access. In the context of rehabilitation services, we implemented a slight variation of the dimensional modeling technique to make a data warehouse more appropriate for healthcare. One of the key aspects of designing a healthcare data warehouse is finding the right grain (scope) for different levels of analysis. We propose three levels of grain that enable the analysis of healthcare outcomes from highly summarized reports on episodes of care to fine-grained studies of progress from one treatment visit to the next. These grains allow the database to support multiple levels of analysis, which is imperative for healthcare decision making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  OLAP; data warehouse; healthcare; multidimensional database

Year:  2005        PMID: 18066371      PMCID: PMC2047311     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag        ISSN: 1559-4122


  8 in total

Review 1.  SF-36 health survey update.

Authors:  J E Ware
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  The Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; P B Pynsent
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The SF 36 health survey questionnaire. A valid measure of health status...

Authors:  D Ruta; A Garratt; M Abdalla; K Buckingham; I Russell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-08-14

5.  The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; J Couper; J B Davies; J P O'Brien
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.358

6.  The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; J F Lu; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.

Authors:  J E Brazier; R Harper; N M Jones; A O'Cathain; K J Thomas; T Usherwood; L Westlake
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-07-18

8.  Outcome, efficiency, and time-trend pattern analyses for stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  M G Stineman; C V Granger
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.159

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Policy agenda for the next decade: creating a path for graceful evolution and harmonized classifications and terminologies used for encoding health information in electronic environments.

Authors:  Margaret M Foley; Regina M Glenn; Peggy L Meli; Rita A Scichilone
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2009-09-16

2.  Building a diabetes screening population data repository using electronic medical records.

Authors:  Wen-Jan Tuan; Ann M Sheehy; Maureen A Smith
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

3.  A centralized research data repository enhances retrospective outcomes research capacity: a case report.

Authors:  Gregory William Hruby; James McKiernan; Suzanne Bakken; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Team building: electronic management-clinical translational research (eM-CTR) systems.

Authors:  Alfred A Cecchetti; Bambang Parmanto; Marcella L Vecchio; Sjarif Ahmad; Shama Buch; Nathalie K Zgheib; Stephen J Groark; Anupama Vemuganti; Marjorie Romkes; Frank Sciurba; Michael P Donahoe; Robert A Branch
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.689

5.  Use of automatic SQL generation interface to enhance transparency and validity of health-data analysis.

Authors:  Kavishwar B Wagholikar; David Zelle; Layne Ainsworth; Kira Chaney; Alexander J Blood; Angela Miller; Rupendra Chulyadyo; Michael Oates; William J Gordon; Samuel J Aronson; Benjamin M Scirica; Shawn N Murphy
Journal:  Inform Med Unlocked       Date:  2022-06-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.