Literature DB >> 18064589

An evaluation of spatial thresholding techniques in fMRI analysis.

Brent R Logan1, Maya P Geliazkova, Daniel B Rowe.   

Abstract

Many fMRI experiments have a common objective of identifying active voxels in a neuroimaging dataset. This is done in single subject experiments, for example, by performing individual voxel-wise tests of the null hypothesis that the observed time course is not significantly related to an assigned reference function. A voxel activation map is then constructed by applying a thresholding rule to the resulting statistics (e.g., t-statistics). Typically the task-related activation is expected to occur in clusters of voxels rather than in isolated single voxels. A variety of spatial thresholding techniques have been proposed to reflect this belief, including smoothing the raw t-statistics, cluster size inference, and spatial mixture modeling. We study two aspects of these spatial thresholding procedures applied to single subject fMRI analysis through simulation. First, we examine the performance of these procedures in terms of sensitivity to detect voxel activation, using receiver operating characteristic curves. Second, we consider the accuracy of these spatial thresholding procedures in estimation of the size of the activation region, both in terms of bias and variance. The findings indicate that smoothing has the highest sensitivity to modest magnitude signals, but tend to overestimate the size of the activation region. Spatial mixture models estimate the size of a spatially distributed activation region well, but may be less sensitive to modest magnitude signals, indicating that additional research into more sensitive spatial mixture models is needed. Finally, the methods are illustrated with a real bilateral finger-tapping fMRI experiment. Copyright 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18064589      PMCID: PMC6870886          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  30 in total

1.  Spatial mixture modeling of fMRI data.

Authors:  N V Hartvig; J L Jensen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Bayesian spatiotemporal inference in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  C Gössl; D P Auer; L Fahrmeir
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  An evaluation of methods for detecting brain activations from functional neuroimages.

Authors:  Ana S Lukic; Miles N Wernick; Stephen C Strother
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.326

4.  Validating cluster size inference: random field and permutation methods.

Authors:  Satoru Hayasaka; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Constrained linear basis sets for HRF modelling using Variational Bayes.

Authors:  Mark W Woolrich; Timothy E J Behrens; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christian F Beckmann; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Fully Bayesian spatio-temporal modeling of FMRI data.

Authors:  Mark W Woolrich; Mark Jenkinson; J Michael Brady; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold.

Authors:  S D Forman; J D Cohen; M Fitzgerald; W F Eddy; M A Mintun; D C Noll
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Mixture model mapping of the brain activation in functional magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  B S Everitt; E T Bullmore
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R W Cox; A Jesmanowicz; J S Hyde
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  15 in total

1.  Alternative thresholding methods for fMRI data optimized for surgical planning.

Authors:  William L Gross; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Enhancing the utility of complex-valued functional magnetic resonance imaging detection of neurobiological processes through postacquisition estimation and correction of dynamic B(0) errors and motion.

Authors:  Andrew D Hahn; Andrew S Nencka; Daniel B Rowe
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  An iterative two-threshold analysis for single-subject functional MRI of the human brain.

Authors:  Tibor Auer; Renate Schweizer; Jens Frahm
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Evaluation of multiple comparison correction procedures in drug assessment studies using LORETA maps.

Authors:  Joan Francesc Alonso; Sergio Romero; Miguel Ángel Mañanas; Mónica Rojas; Jordi Riba; Manel José Barbanoj
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Decreased cortical thickness in central hypoventilation syndrome.

Authors:  Paul M Macey; Ammar S Moiyadi; Rajesh Kumar; Mary A Woo; Ronald M Harper
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Unified framework for robust estimation of brain networks from FMRI using temporal and spatial correlation analyses.

Authors:  Yongmei Michelle Wang; Jing Xia
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging brain activation directly from k-space.

Authors:  Daniel B Rowe; Andrew D Hahn; Andrew S Nencka
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Application of independent component analysis for the data mining of simultaneous Eeg-fMRI: preliminary experience on sleep onset.

Authors:  Jong-Hwan Lee; Sungsuk Oh; Ferenc A Jolesz; Hyunwook Park; Seung-Schik Yoo
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.292

9.  The optimal power puzzle: scrutiny of the monotone likelihood ratio assumption in multiple testing.

Authors:  Hongyuan Cao; Wenguang Sun; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.445

10.  COMPLEX-VALUED TIME SERIES MODELING FOR IMPROVED ACTIVATION DETECTION IN FMRI STUDIES.

Authors:  Daniel W Adrian; Ranjan Maitra; Daniel B Rowe
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.083

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.