Literature DB >> 18063540

Distress assessment: practice change through guideline implementation.

Caryl D Fulcher1, Tracy K Gosselin-Acomb.   

Abstract

Most nurses agree that incorporating evidence into practice is necessary to provide quality care, but barriers such as time, resources, and knowledge often interfere with the actual implementation of practice change. Published practice guidelines are one source to direct practice; this article focuses on the use of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network's Clinical Practice Guidelines for Oncology: Distress Management, which articulate standards and demonstrate assessment for psychosocial distress. Planning for the implementation of the guidelines in a feasibility pilot in a busy radiation oncology clinic is described. Results indicate that adding a distress assessment using the distress thermometer and problem checklist did not present substantial burden to nurses in the clinic or overwhelm the mental health, pastoral care, or oncology social work referral sources with more patients. Understanding distress scores and problems identified by patients helped the nurses direct education interventions and referrals appropriately; improved patient satisfaction scores reflected this.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18063540     DOI: 10.1188/07.CJON.817-821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs        ISSN: 1092-1095            Impact factor:   1.027


  10 in total

1.  Using Rasch analysis to examine the distress thermometer's cut-off scores among a mixed group of patients with cancer.

Authors:  Sylvie D Lambert; Julie F Pallant; Kerrie Clover; Benjamin Britton; Madeleine T King; Gregory Carter
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  New perspectives in clinical research: the Women's Cancer Research Foundation's experience.

Authors:  John P Micha; Cheri L Graham; Mark A Rettenmaier; John V Brown; Bram H Goldstein
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2009-01-13

3.  Treatment referral before and after the introduction of the Liverpool Patients Concerns Inventory (PCI) into routine head and neck oncology outpatient clinics.

Authors:  Naseem Ghazali; Anastasios Kanatas; Daniel J R Langley; Barry Scott; Derek Lowe; Simon N Rogers
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Distress Management, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Michelle B Riba; Kristine A Donovan; Barbara Andersen; IIana Braun; William S Breitbart; Benjamin W Brewer; Luke O Buchmann; Matthew M Clark; Molly Collins; Cheyenne Corbett; Stewart Fleishman; Sofia Garcia; Donna B Greenberg; Rev George F Handzo; Laura Hoofring; Chao-Hui Huang; Robin Lally; Sara Martin; Lisa McGuffey; William Mitchell; Laura J Morrison; Megan Pailler; Oxana Palesh; Francine Parnes; Janice P Pazar; Laurel Ralston; Jaroslava Salman; Moreen M Shannon-Dudley; Alan D Valentine; Nicole R McMillian; Susan D Darlow
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 11.908

5.  Standardizing Assessment of Competences and Competencies of Oncology Nurses Working in Ambulatory Care.

Authors:  Clara Beaver; Morris A Magnan; Denise Henderson; Patricia DeRose; Kathleen Carolin; Gerold Bepler
Journal:  J Nurses Prof Dev       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

6.  Examining the introduction of a supportive care screening and referral process for cancer patients: how does practice compare with protocols?

Authors:  Melanie Regan; Eli Ristevski; Rebecca Jones; Sibilah Breen; Allison Hartney
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  An analysis of the distress thermometer problem list and distress in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Lisa VanHoose; Lora L Black; Kimberly Doty; Dory Sabata; Philip Twumasi-Ankrah; Sarah Taylor; Rhonda Johnson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Acceptability of the Distress Thermometer and Problem List to community-based telephone cancer helpline operators, and to cancer patients and carers.

Authors:  Karen L Hughes; Hilary Sargeant; Anna L Hawkes
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Towards identifying cancer patients at risk to miss out on psycho-oncological treatment via machine learning.

Authors:  Moritz Philipp Günther; Johannes Kirchebner; Jan Ben Schulze; Roland von Känel; Sebastian Euler
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.328

10.  Feasibility of brief psychological distress screening by a community-based telephone helpline for cancer patients and carers.

Authors:  Anna L Hawkes; Karen L Hughes; Sandy D Hutchison; Suzanne K Chambers
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 4.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.