OBJECTIVE: We examine the procedural validity of a standardized instrument for the diagnosis of psychotic disorders in Morocco. METHOD: Twenty-nine patients from Casablanca, Morocco, with a psychotic or mood disorder were examined using the Comprehensive Assessment of Symptoms and History (CASH) an adapted version using cultural formulation to make the instrument more culturally sensitive (CASH-CS). Chance corrected agreement was calculated between diagnoses based on these two versions of CASH and independent clinical diagnoses according to local psychiatrists. RESULTS: Agreement for traditional CASH versus clinical diagnosis and for CASH versus CASH-CS was low (kappa = -0.19; SD 0.16 and kappa = 0.21; SD 0.16, respectively). De CASH-CS, showed good agreement with clinical diagnosis (kappa = 0.79; SD 0.11). CONCLUSION: Standardized instruments for the assessment of psychosis such as the CASH may be liable to cultural misinterpretations. This may be relevant to the interpretation of the high incidence rates of schizophrenia among immigrants. SIGNIFICANT OUTCOMES: Agreement between a culturally naïve version of a standardized diagnostic instrument for the assessment of psychosis and clinical diagnosis by Moroccan psychiatrists is poor. Adding additional probes and decision rules based on cultural formulation improves agreement with clinical diagnosis significantly. LIMITATIONS: The study was conducted in a small sample. Both versions of CASH were administered by the same interviewer in a single interview session.
OBJECTIVE: We examine the procedural validity of a standardized instrument for the diagnosis of psychotic disorders in Morocco. METHOD: Twenty-nine patients from Casablanca, Morocco, with a psychotic or mood disorder were examined using the Comprehensive Assessment of Symptoms and History (CASH) an adapted version using cultural formulation to make the instrument more culturally sensitive (CASH-CS). Chance corrected agreement was calculated between diagnoses based on these two versions of CASH and independent clinical diagnoses according to local psychiatrists. RESULTS: Agreement for traditional CASH versus clinical diagnosis and for CASH versus CASH-CS was low (kappa = -0.19; SD 0.16 and kappa = 0.21; SD 0.16, respectively). De CASH-CS, showed good agreement with clinical diagnosis (kappa = 0.79; SD 0.11). CONCLUSION: Standardized instruments for the assessment of psychosis such as the CASH may be liable to cultural misinterpretations. This may be relevant to the interpretation of the high incidence rates of schizophrenia among immigrants. SIGNIFICANT OUTCOMES: Agreement between a culturally naïve version of a standardized diagnostic instrument for the assessment of psychosis and clinical diagnosis by Moroccan psychiatrists is poor. Adding additional probes and decision rules based on cultural formulation improves agreement with clinical diagnosis significantly. LIMITATIONS: The study was conducted in a small sample. Both versions of CASH were administered by the same interviewer in a single interview session.
Authors: Stephen M Strakowski; Paul E Keck; Lesley M Arnold; Jacqueline Collins; Rodgers M Wilson; David E Fleck; Kimberly B Corey; Jennifer Amicone; Victor R Adebimpe Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: G Eric Jarvis; Irene Toniolo; Andrew G Ryder; Francesco Sessa; Carla Cremonese Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Matty A S de Wit; Wilco C Tuinebreijer; Giel H A van Brussel; Jean-Paul Selten Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2010-11-13 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Roberto Lewis-Fernández; Neil Krishan Aggarwal; Sofie Bäärnhielm; Hans Rohlof; Laurence J Kirmayer; Mitchell G Weiss; Sushrut Jadhav; Ladson Hinton; Renato D Alarcón; Dinesh Bhugra; Simon Groen; Rob van Dijk; Adil Qureshi; Francisco Collazos; Cécile Rousseau; Luis Caballero; Mar Ramos; Francis Lu Journal: Psychiatry Date: 2014 Impact factor: 2.458
Authors: Anzalee Khan; Christian Yavorsky; Stacy Liechti; Mark Opler; Brian Rothman; Guillermo DiClemente; Luka Lucic; Sofija Jovic; Toshiya Inada; Lawrence Yang Journal: BMC Psychol Date: 2013-03-11