Literature DB >> 18058614

Miniprobe EUS in the pretherapeutic assessment of early esophageal neoplasia.

M Chemaly1, O Scalone, G Durivage, B Napoleon, B Pujol, C Lefort, V Hervieux, J Y Scoazec, J C Souquet, T Ponchon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The high-frequency endosonography miniprobe has been advocated prior to endoscopic treatment of superficial esophageal neoplasm. We conducted a retrospective study, which summarized our clinical experience with various miniprobe techniques in the assessment of early squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and superficial adenocarcinoma on Barrett's mucosa (SAB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 106 superficial and naive esophageal lesions were included in this series (52 SAB, 54 SCC). The results of the miniprobe staging were compared with pathology in order to determine the accuracy of this technique in differentiating mucosal from submucosal infiltration. Secondary aims were a comparison between the frequencies (20- vs. 30-MHz) and coupling methods (water-filled lumen vs. balloon-sheathed catheter) used.
RESULTS: Overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity to differentiate T1sm from T1 m tumors were 73.5 %, 62 %, and 76.5 %, respectively. Overdiagnosis occurred in 18.6 % of the lesions. No statistically significant difference was found in the accuracy of the miniprobe staging between the two lesion types (SCC and SAB) ( P = 0.65), and results were significantly poorer in the distal part of the esophagus ( P = 0.00039). No significant difference was found between the two frequencies ( P = 0.51). Water-filled lumen proved to be superior to the balloon-sheathed catheter ( P = 0.015).
CONCLUSION: High-frequency miniprobe examination has a limited accuracy in the detection of submucosal invasion in early esophageal cancer. Further improvements in acoustic coupling and ultrasound technique are required to improve the miniprobe accuracy before its implementation into clinical routine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18058614     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  17 in total

1.  [Ultrasound of the larynx, hypopharynx and upper esophagus].

Authors:  C Arens; J Weigt; J Schumacher; M Kraft
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Endoscopic ultrasound using ultrasound probes for the diagnosis of early esophageal and gastric cancers.

Authors:  Shigetaka Yoshinaga; Ichiro Oda; Satoru Nonaka; Ryoji Kushima; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-06-16

3.  Is Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) necessary in the pre-therapeutic assessment of Barrett's esophagus with early neoplasia?

Authors:  Jacobo Ortiz Fernández-Sordo; Vani J A Konda; Jennifer Chennat; Erika Madrigal-Hoyos; Mitchell C Posner; Mark K Ferguson; Irving Waxman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2012-12

Review 4.  Endoscopic mucosal resection in the management of esophageal neoplasia: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Vikneswaran Namasivayam; Kenneth K Wang; Ganapathy A Prasad
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 5.  Endoscopic Treatment of Early-Stage Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Mariam Naveed; Nisa Kubiliun
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Endoscopic assessment and management of early esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ghassan M Hammoud; Hazem Hammad; Jamal A Ibdah
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-08-15

7.  Miniprobe endoscopic ultrasound accurately stages esophageal cancer and guides therapeutic decisions in the era of neoadjuvant therapy: results of a multicenter cohort analysis.

Authors:  Tobias Meister; Hauke Sebastian Heinzow; Regina Osterkamp; Till Wehrmann; Torsten Kucharzik; Wolfram Domschke; Dirk Domagk; Hans Seifert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Clinicopathologic factors influencing the accuracy of EUS for superficial esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jung Im Jung; Gwang Ha Kim; Hoseok I; Do Youn Park; Tae Kyun Kim; Young Hwa Cho; Yong Wan Sung; Mun Ki Choi; Bong Eun Lee; Geun Am Song
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Endoscopic mucosal resection results in change of histologic diagnosis in Barrett's esophagus patients with visible and flat neoplasia: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Sachin Wani; Julian Abrams; Steven A Edmundowicz; Srinivas Gaddam; Christine E Hovis; Daniel Green; Neil Gupta; April Higbee; Ajay Bansal; Amit Rastogi; Dayna Early; Charles J Lightdale; Prateek Sharma
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  High-resolution endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound for evaluation of early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  T Thomas; D Gilbert; P V Kaye; I Penman; G P Aithal; Krish Ragunath
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.