Literature DB >> 18058349

Pilot study on lower nitrosamine smokeless tobacco products compared with medicinal nicotine.

M Irene Mendoza-Baumgart1, Ozlem E Tulunay, Stephen S Hecht, Yan Zhang, Sharon Murphy, Chap Le, Joni Jensen, Dorothy K Hatsukami.   

Abstract

Smokeless tobacco (ST) products have the potential to be used as a harm reduction method for cigarette smokers. These products can deliver significantly less toxicants than cigarettes, although they are not toxicant free nor harmless. It is important to examine potential health risks and benefits of these products. These two small pilot studies examined the effects of two different ST products (Exalt and Ariva) compared with medicinal nicotine, another potential harm reduction product. Dependent, healthy adult cigarette smokers, who were motivated to quit smoking, underwent 1 week of baseline smoking measurement. They were then asked to quit smoking and were randomly assigned to use either an ST product or a medicinal nicotine lozenge (MNL, Commit) for 2 weeks, then crossed over to use the other product for 2 weeks. In the last week, following the sampling phase, subjects could choose the product they wished to use. Assessments were made repeatedly during baseline cigarette use and throughout the 5 weeks of treatment. Outcome measures included biomarkers for tobacco exposure and subjective, physiological, and behavioral responses. Tobacco-specific carcinogen uptake was greater from Exalt than from the MNL, and was comparable between the MNL and Ariva. Physiological effects and subjective effects on withdrawal and craving were comparable among Exalt, Ariva, and the MNL. Ariva was preferred over the MNL, which was preferred over Exalt. With the exception of medicinal nicotine products, low-nitrosamine ST products have the greatest potential to result in reduced toxicant exposure compared with other combustible reduced exposure products and have promise for reducing individual risk for disease. However, the population effect of marketing of such products as reduced exposure/reduced risk is unknown. The need for further research in this area and regulation of tobacco products is evident.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18058349     DOI: 10.1080/14622200701704228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  20 in total

1.  The ratio of a urinary tobacco-specific lung carcinogen metabolite to cotinine is significantly higher in passive than in active smokers.

Authors:  Rachel I Vogel; Steven G Carmella; Irina Stepanov; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  A pilot randomized study of smokeless tobacco use among smokers not interested in quitting: changes in smoking behavior and readiness to quit.

Authors:  Matthew J Carpenter; Kevin M Gray
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Centers: research achievements and future implications.

Authors:  Timothy B Baker; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami; C Anderson Johnson; Caryn Lerman; Raymond Niaura; Stephanie S O'Malley
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 4.  Measures for assessing subjective effects of potential reduced-exposure products.

Authors:  Karen Hanson; Richard O'Connor; Dorothy Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Caregivers' interest in using smokeless tobacco products: Novel methods that may reduce children's exposure to secondhand smoke.

Authors:  Theodore L Wagener; Alayna P Tackett; Belinda Borrelli
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2015-04-06

6.  Subjective responses to oral tobacco products: scale validation.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Yan Zhang; Richard J O'Connor; Herb H Severson
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Clinical Laboratory Evaluation of Electronic Cigarettes/Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: Methodological Challenges.

Authors:  Melissa D Blank; Alison B Breland; Caroline O Cobb; Tory Spindle; Carolina Ramôa; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-10

Review 8.  Abuse liability assessment of tobacco products including potential reduced exposure products.

Authors:  Lawrence P Carter; Maxine L Stitzer; Jack E Henningfield; Rich J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 9.  Clinical trials methods for evaluation of potential reduced exposure products.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Karen Hanson; Anna Briggs; Mark Parascandola; Jeanine M Genkinger; Richard O'Connor; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  The use of snus for quitting smoking compared with medicinal products.

Authors:  Karl Erik Lund; Ann McNeill; Janne Scheffels
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 4.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.