Literature DB >> 18058075

Maintenance for acute myeloid leukemia revisited.

Thomas Büchner1, Utz Krug, Wolfgang E Berdel, Achim Heinecke, Maria Cristina Sauerland, Bernhard Wörmann, Wolfgang Hiddemann.   

Abstract

Maintenance treatment for AML is an approach to minimize residual disease, optimize quality of remission and prevent a leukemic regrowth over a longer period of time. This intention implies a certain antileukemic activity and myelotoxicity. Thus, a prolonged myelosuppressive maintenance is best exemplified by the optimized protocol of the CALGB published by Kanti R. Rai in 1981 (Blood 58:1203-1212, 1981) and derived by the AMLCG as a therapeutic standard. From our today's knowledge about the impact of various strategies, a lack of postremission therapy is not compatible with durable remissions. Even after an induction-type consolidation, the classic CALGB-type maintenance, or a comparably intensive regimen improved the relapse-free survival over that from alternatives. Some studies which failed to show a benefit used maintenance at low-dosage or short duration. Data about maintenance delivery in patients reaching long-term remissions demonstrate feasibility and compliance, and a low maintenance-related death rate can compete with that from alternative options. Revisiting maintenance, however, requires a comparison with other strategies on the basis of intention-to-treat. Either single prospective trials or crosstrial networking by a common standard arm and general upfront randomization can further assess the relative value of maintenance for AML.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18058075     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-007-0041-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  20 in total

1.  Up-front randomization and common standard arm: a proposal for comparing AML treatment strategies between different studies.

Authors:  Thomas Büchner; Hartmut Döhner; Gerhard Ehninger; Arnold Ganser; Jörg Hasford
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.156

2.  Double induction containing either two courses or one course of high-dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone and postremission therapy by either autologous stem-cell transplantation or by prolonged maintenance for acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Thomas Büchner; Wolfgang E Berdel; Claudia Schoch; Torsten Haferlach; Hubert L Serve; Joachim Kienast; Susanne Schnittger; Wolfgang Kern; Joelle Tchinda; Albrecht Reichle; Eva Lengfelder; Peter Staib; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig; Carlo Aul; Hartmut Eimermacher; Leopold Balleisen; Maria-Cristina Sauerland; Achim Heinecke; Bernhard Wörmann; Wolfgang Hiddemann
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Results of a HOVON/SAKK donor versus no-donor analysis of myeloablative HLA-identical sibling stem cell transplantation in first remission acute myeloid leukemia in young and middle-aged adults: benefits for whom?

Authors:  Jan J Cornelissen; Wim L J van Putten; Leo F Verdonck; Matthias Theobald; Emanuel Jacky; Simon M G Daenen; Marinus van Marwijk Kooy; Pierre Wijermans; Harry Schouten; Peter C Huijgens; Hans van der Lelie; Martin Fey; Augustin Ferrant; Johan Maertens; Alois Gratwohl; Bob Lowenberg
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Established practice in the treatment of patients with acute promyleocytic leukemia and the introduction of arsenic trioxide as a novel therapy.

Authors:  Hervé Dombret; Pierre Fenaux; Steven L Soignet; Martin S Tallman
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.851

5.  Allogeneic compared with autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of patients younger than 46 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1): an intention-to-treat analysis of the EORTC/GIMEMAAML-10 trial.

Authors:  Stefan Suciu; Franco Mandelli; Theo de Witte; Robert Zittoun; Eugenio Gallo; Boris Labar; Gennaro De Rosa; Amine Belhabri; Rosario Giustolisi; Richard Delarue; Vincenzo Liso; Salvatore Mirto; Giuseppe Leone; Jean-Henri Bourhis; Giuseppe Fioritoni; Ulrich Jehn; Sergio Amadori; Paola Fazi; Anne Hagemeijer; Roel Willemze
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Comparison of three remission induction regimens and two postinduction strategies for the treatment of acute nonlymphocytic leukemia: a cancer and leukemia group B study.

Authors:  H Preisler; R B Davis; J Kirshner; E Dupre; F Richards; H C Hoagland; S Kopel; R N Levy; R Carey; P Schulman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Chemotherapy compared with autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in the management of acute myeloid leukemia in first remission.

Authors:  P A Cassileth; D P Harrington; F R Appelbaum; H M Lazarus; J M Rowe; E Paietta; C Willman; D D Hurd; J M Bennett; K G Blume; D R Head; P H Wiernik
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-12-03       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  6-Thioguanine, cytarabine, and daunorubicin (TAD) and high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (HAM) for induction, TAD for consolidation, and either prolonged maintenance by reduced monthly TAD or TAD-HAM-TAD and one course of intensive consolidation by sequential HAM in adult patients at all ages with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a randomized trial of the German AML Cooperative Group.

Authors:  Thomas Büchner; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Wolfgang E Berdel; Bernhard Wörmann; Claudia Schoch; Christa Fonatsch; Helmut Löffler; Torsten Haferlach; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig; Georg Maschmeyer; Peter Staib; Carlo Aul; Andreas Gruneisen; Eva Lengfelder; Norbert Frickhofen; Wolfgang Kern; Hubert L Serve; Rolf M Mesters; Maria Cristina Sauerland; Achim Heinecke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Intensive postremission chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

Authors:  R J Mayer; R B Davis; C A Schiffer; D T Berg; B L Powell; P Schulman; G A Omura; J O Moore; O R McIntyre; E Frei
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-10-06       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Randomized study of individualized induction therapy with or without vincristine, and of maintenance-intensification therapy between 4 or 12 courses in adult acute myeloid leukemia. AML-87 Study of the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group.

Authors:  R Ohno; T Kobayashi; M Tanimoto; A Hiraoka; K Imai; N Asou; M Tomonaga; K Tsubaki; I Takahashi; Y Kodera
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Acute myeloid leukemia stem cells: seek and destroy.

Authors:  Gail J Roboz; Monica Guzman
Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.929

2.  Acute myeloid leukemia: focus on novel therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Tara L Lin; M Yair Levy
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2012-05-16

3.  Activation of Investigator-Initiated Clinical Trials with a Pharmaceutical for Cancer Patients before and after Post-Millennial Changes of Regulations in Germany and Europe.

Authors:  Wolfgang E Berdel
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.