Literature DB >> 14673036

6-Thioguanine, cytarabine, and daunorubicin (TAD) and high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (HAM) for induction, TAD for consolidation, and either prolonged maintenance by reduced monthly TAD or TAD-HAM-TAD and one course of intensive consolidation by sequential HAM in adult patients at all ages with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a randomized trial of the German AML Cooperative Group.

Thomas Büchner1, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Wolfgang E Berdel, Bernhard Wörmann, Claudia Schoch, Christa Fonatsch, Helmut Löffler, Torsten Haferlach, Wolf-Dieter Ludwig, Georg Maschmeyer, Peter Staib, Carlo Aul, Andreas Gruneisen, Eva Lengfelder, Norbert Frickhofen, Wolfgang Kern, Hubert L Serve, Rolf M Mesters, Maria Cristina Sauerland, Achim Heinecke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the efficacy of prolonged maintenance chemotherapy versus intensified consolidation therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight hundred thirty-two patients (median age, 54 years; range, 16 to 82 years) with de novo AML were randomly assigned to receive 6-thioguanine, cytarabine, and daunorubicin (TAD) plus cytarabine and mitoxantrone (HAM; cytarabine 3 g/m2 [age < 60 years] or 1 g/m2 [age > or = 60 years] x 6) induction, TAD consolidation, and monthly modified TAD maintenance for 3 years, or TAD-HAM-TAD and one course of intensive consolidation with sequential HAM (S-HAM) with cytarabine 1 g/m2 (age < 60 years) or 0.5 g/m2 (age > or = 60 years) x 8 instead of maintenance.
RESULTS: A total of 69.2% patients went into complete remission (CR). Median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 19 months for patients on the maintenance arm, with 31.4% of patients relapse-free at 5 years, versus 12 months for patients on the S-HAM arm, with 24.7% of patients relapse-free at 5 years (P =.0118). RFS from maintenance was superior in patients with poor risk by unfavorable karyotype, age > or = 60 years, lactate dehydrogenase level greater than 700 U/L, or day 16 bone marrow blasts greater than 40% (P =.0061) but not in patients with good risk by complete absence of any poor risk factors. Although a survival benefit in the CR patients is not significant (P =.085), more surviving patients in the maintenance than in the S-HAM arm remain in first CR (P =.026).
CONCLUSION: We conclude that TAD-HAM-TAD-maintenance first-line treatment has a higher curative potential than TAD-HAM-TAD-S-HAM and improves prognosis even among patients with poor prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14673036     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.02.133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  32 in total

1.  [Risk-adapted therapy in acute myeloid leukemia].

Authors:  M Fiegl; W Hiddemann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  What Is the Best Daunorubicin Dose and Schedule for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Induction?

Authors:  Priyanka Pophali; Mark Litzow
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-01

3.  In vitro-induced response patterns of antileukemic T cells: characterization by spectratyping and immunophenotyping.

Authors:  Susanne Reuther; Helga Schmetzer; Friedhelm R Schuster; Pina Krell; Christine Grabrucker; Anja Liepert; Tanja Kroell; Hans-Jochem Kolb; Arndt Borkhardt; Raymund Buhmann
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 4.  Targeting acute myeloid leukemia stem cells: a review and principles for the development of clinical trials.

Authors:  Daniel A Pollyea; Jonathan A Gutman; Lia Gore; Clayton A Smith; Craig T Jordan
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 5.  Maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: an evidence-based review of randomized trials.

Authors:  Armin Rashidi; Roland B Walter; Martin S Tallman; Frederick R Appelbaum; John F DiPersio
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Acute myeloid leukaemia: optimal management and recent developments.

Authors:  Luis Villela; Javier Bolaños-Meade
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Chemotherapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first remission.

Authors:  Kenneth Bradstock
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 8.  Histamine dihydrochloride: in the management of acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Lily P H Yang; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Challenges in treating older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Lagadinou D Eleni; Zoumbos C Nicholas; Spyridonidis Alexandros
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.375

10.  HLA-identical sibling allogeneic transplants versus chemotherapy in acute myelogenous leukemia with t(8;21) in first complete remission: collaborative study between the German AML Intergroup and CIBMTR.

Authors:  Richard F Schlenk; Marcelo C Pasquini; Waleska S Pérez; Mei-Jie Zhang; Jürgen Krauter; Joseph H Antin; Asad Bashey; Brian J Bolwell; Thomas Büchner; Jean-Yves Cahn; Mitchell S Cairo; Edward A Copelan; Corey S Cutler; Hartmut Döhner; Robert Peter Gale; Osman Ilhan; Hillard M Lazarus; Jane L Liesveld; Mark R Litzow; David I Marks; Richard T Maziarz; Philip L McCarthy; Stephen D Nimer; Jorge Sierra; Martin S Tallman; Daniel J Weisdorf; Mary M Horowitz; Arnold Ganser
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.